Massad Joseph
Columbia Univ.
Psychoanal Hist. 2009;11(2):193-208. doi: 10.3366/e1460823509000403.
This paper examines the terms and methods used by psychoanalytic authors to explain and understand something they other as "Islam." The paper engages critically and psycho-analytically with these authors' attempts to read "Islam" psychoanalytically, and finds that more often than not they subject it to liberal principles that are not defined in psychoanalytic terms. Focusing on the work of Tunisian author Fethi Benslama, the paper analyses and deconstructs certain key semantic and conceptual confusions of "Islam" and "Islamism" that are manifest in the general psychoanalytic literature on "Islam".
本文审视了精神分析领域的作者们用于解释和理解他们所谓“伊斯兰教”的术语与方法。本文以批判性的精神分析视角,探讨了这些作者对“伊斯兰教”进行精神分析解读的尝试,发现他们常常将其置于并非以精神分析术语界定的自由主义原则之下。本文聚焦于突尼斯作家费提·本斯拉马的作品,分析并解构了“伊斯兰教”和“伊斯兰主义”在关于“伊斯兰教”的一般精神分析文献中所呈现出的某些关键语义和概念混淆。