Sezione di Fisica Medica, U.O.Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, via Roma 67, I56125 Pisa, Italy.
Phys Med. 2010 Apr;26(2):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
In Graves' disease therapy, the amount of (131)I is usually decided following two different modalities: the administration of a fixed activity or of an activity individually calculated based on a fixed value of target absorbed dose. Although the effectiveness of each of these approaches is good (about 80% of patients cured), the ALARA principle must be applied avoiding the un-justified radioactivity to the patient himself, the people living/working near him and the environment. In this paper a new approach to the (131)I therapy in Graves' disease, based on the optimum value of the final thyroid mass, is presented.
97 Graves' disease patients (29 males) were randomly assigned into three groups (GR1, GR2, GR3). In two of them (GR1, GR3) the radioiodine administering activity was calculated based on two fixed thyroid absorbed dose values (100 Gy for GR1; 400 Gy for GR3), in GR2 it was calculated based on the desired final optimum thyroid mass value m(f)=0.24 m(0)/U(0)
The rate of cured patients are 48% (GR1), 97% (GR2) (z-test, p<0.001) and 97% (GR3). The average activity administered to GR2 (393 + or - 157 MBq) is lower than that administrered to GR3 patients (524 + or - 201 MBq) (p=0.007, two-tails unpaired t-test); the thyroid absorbed dose in GR2 (262 + or - 78 Gy) is lower than in GR3 patients (407 + or - 23 Gy) (p<0.001, two-tails unpaired t-test).
Our results demonstrate that the thyroid-mass based approach optimizes the treatment avoiding an un-justified excess or a not-effective too low activity without time and resources consuming.
在格雷夫斯病治疗中,碘 131 的用量通常采用两种不同的方法来决定:给予固定的活度或根据目标吸收剂量的固定值来计算活度。尽管这两种方法的有效性都很好(约 80%的患者被治愈),但必须应用 ALARA 原则,避免对患者自身、居住/工作在他附近的人和环境造成不必要的放射性。本文提出了一种基于最终甲状腺质量最佳值的格雷夫斯病碘 131 治疗的新方法。
97 例格雷夫斯病患者(29 例男性)被随机分为三组(GR1、GR2、GR3)。其中两组(GR1、GR3)的放射性碘给予活度是基于两个固定的甲状腺吸收剂量值(GR1 为 100Gy;GR3 为 400Gy)计算的,GR2 是根据期望的最终最佳甲状腺质量值 m(f)=0.24 m(0)/U(0) 计算的。
治愈患者的比例分别为 48%(GR1)、97%(GR2)(Z 检验,p<0.001)和 97%(GR3)。GR2 组给予的平均活度(393+/-157MBq)低于 GR3 组(524+/-201MBq)(p=0.007,双侧非配对 t 检验);GR2 组的甲状腺吸收剂量(262+/-78Gy)低于 GR3 组(407+/-23Gy)(p<0.001,双侧非配对 t 检验)。
我们的结果表明,基于甲状腺质量的方法可以优化治疗,避免不必要的过量或无效的过低活度,同时不消耗过多的时间和资源。