• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部治疗银屑病的事先授权:对管理式医疗是否具有成本效益?

Prior authorization for topical psoriasis treatments: is it cost-beneficial for managed care?

机构信息

Center for Medication Use, Policy, and Economics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1065, USA.

出版信息

J Dermatolog Treat. 2010 May;21(3):178-84. doi: 10.3109/09546630903268247.

DOI:10.3109/09546630903268247
PMID:19821787
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The introduction of novel therapeutic options for psoriasis has raised managed care's interest in controlling costs associated with dermatological treatments. Prior authorization (PA) can be a successful way of managing costs. However, experience with topical treatments for acne suggests that PA may not be cost-effective. The role of managed care in dermatology and the potential impact of PA requirements for novel topical therapies for psoriasis are considered.

METHODS

Using a model based on recent survey data, total annual cost estimates for a managed care organization to cover psoriasis treatment with a topical agent with or without PA requirements were calculated and compared. Costs for treatment and administrative costs associated with PA processes were included. The model assumed 68 000 insured patients required treatment (with an additional 1% to account for abuse/misuse), an average wholesale price of $100 per prescription (each prescription filled 4x/year), and a cost of $20 to process each PA request.

RESULTS

The total annual costs were $28 573 600 when PA was required and $27 472 000 when PA was not required. Thus, there was a total annual loss to the managed care organization of $1 101 600 associated with PA requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

Requiring PA for novel topical treatments for psoriasis, such as the new two-compound product containing calcipotriene and betamethasone dipropionate (Taclonex((R)); Warner Chilcott (US), Inc.; marketed as Daivobet((R))/Dovobet((R)) outside US by LEO Pharma), is not likely to be cost-effective for a managed care organization.

摘要

目的

新型银屑病治疗选择的出现引起了医疗保健机构对控制皮肤科治疗相关成本的关注。预先授权(PA)是一种成功的成本管理方法。然而,痤疮局部治疗的经验表明,PA 可能并不具有成本效益。本文考虑了医疗保健机构在皮肤科的作用以及新型银屑病局部治疗药物的 PA 要求的潜在影响。

方法

使用基于最近调查数据的模型,计算并比较了管理式医疗组织覆盖有或无 PA 要求的局部用药物治疗银屑病的总年度成本估计值。包括治疗成本和与 PA 流程相关的管理成本。该模型假设 68000 名参保患者需要治疗(再增加 1%以考虑滥用/误用),每处方平均批发价为 100 美元(每个处方每年开 4 次),并且处理每个 PA 请求的成本为 20 美元。

结果

需要 PA 时的总年度成本为 28573600 美元,不需要 PA 时的总年度成本为 27472000 美元。因此,与 PA 要求相关的管理式医疗组织的年度总损失为 1101600 美元。

结论

对于新型银屑病局部治疗药物(如含有卡泊三醇和倍他米松二丙酸酯的新型双组份产品,Taclonex((R);Warner Chilcott(美国),Inc.;在美国以外由 LEO Pharma 以 Daivobet((R)/Dovobet((R)) 销售),要求 PA 可能不符合管理式医疗组织的成本效益。

相似文献

1
Prior authorization for topical psoriasis treatments: is it cost-beneficial for managed care?局部治疗银屑病的事先授权:对管理式医疗是否具有成本效益?
J Dermatolog Treat. 2010 May;21(3):178-84. doi: 10.3109/09546630903268247.
2
Systemic treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis: estimates of failure rates and direct medical costs in a north-eastern US managed care plan.中度至重度银屑病的全身治疗:美国东北部管理式医疗计划中的失败率估计和直接医疗成本
J Dermatolog Treat. 2005 Feb;16(1):37-42. doi: 10.1080/09546630510025941.
3
Cost-effectiveness of the two-compound formulation calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate compared with commonly used topical treatments in the management of moderately severe plaque psoriasis in Scotland.在苏格兰,与常用局部治疗方法相比,钙泊三醇和倍他米松二丙酸酯复方制剂治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病的成本效益分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Aug;23(8):1887-901. doi: 10.1185/030079907X210688.
4
Cost-effectiveness model of topical treatment of mild to moderate psoriasis vulgaris in Germany. A comparison of calcipotriol/betamethasone (Daivobet/Dovobet/Taclonex) once daily and a morning/evening non-fix combination of calcipotriol and betamethasone.德国寻常型轻至中度银屑病局部治疗的成本效益模型。卡泊三醇/倍他米松(达力士倍他米松/得肤宝/他卡西醇)每日一次与卡泊三醇和倍他米松早晚非固定组合的比较。
Dermatology. 2007;215(3):219-28. doi: 10.1159/000106791.
5
Paradoxical effects of cost reduction measures in managed care systems for treatment of severe psoriasis.管理式医疗体系中降低成本措施对重度银屑病治疗的矛盾效应。
Dermatol Online J. 2009 Apr 15;15(4):1.
6
Treatments for mild-to-moderate recalcitrant plaque psoriasis: expected clinical and economic outcomes for first-line and second-line care.轻度至中度顽固性斑块状银屑病的治疗:一线和二线治疗的预期临床和经济结果
Dermatol Online J. 2005 Mar 1;11(1):1.
7
Recent trends in systemic psoriasis treatment costs.系统性银屑病治疗费用的近期趋势。
Arch Dermatol. 2010 Jan;146(1):46-54. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.319.
8
Is prior authorization of topical tretinoin for acne cost effective?外用维甲酸治疗痤疮的预先授权是否具有成本效益?
Am J Manag Care. 1999 Apr;5(4):457-63.
9
Using a single product (calcipotriene/betamethasone topical suspension) vs multiple products to manage body and scalp psoriasis: comparisons in resource utilization and costs.单用一种产品(卡泊三醇/倍他米松外用混悬剂)与多种产品治疗体部和头皮银屑病:资源利用和成本比较。
J Med Econ. 2013 Dec;16(12):1405-13. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.848209. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
10
A 52-week randomized safety study of a calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate two-compound product (Dovobet/Daivobet/Taclonex) in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris.一项关于卡泊三醇/倍他米松二丙酸酯复方产品(达力士/得肤宝/他卡西醇)治疗寻常型银屑病的52周随机安全性研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Jun;154(6):1155-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07236.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing the Benefits and Costs of the Safe Step Act on Patients, Physicians, and Insurers.分析《安全步骤法案》对患者、医生和保险公司的收益与成本。
J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2024 Jul;9(3):115-120. doi: 10.1177/24755303241253203. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Evaluating the effect of prior authorizations in patients with complex dermatologic conditions.评估复杂皮肤科疾病患者的预授权的效果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Dec;83(6):1674-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.998. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Realized and Projected Cost-Savings from the Introduction of Generic Imatinib Through Formulary Management in Patients with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia.
通过处方管理引入通用型伊马替尼在慢性粒细胞白血病患者中实现的和预计的成本节约
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2019 Nov;12(7):333-342.
4
Calcipotriol/betamethasone for the treatment of psoriasis: efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability.卡泊三醇/倍他米松治疗银屑病:疗效、安全性及患者可接受性。
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2015 Jun 8;5:97-107. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S63127. eCollection 2015.
5
The Challenge of Managing Psoriasis: Unmet Medical Needs and Stakeholder Perspectives.银屑病管理的挑战:未满足的医疗需求及利益相关者观点
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016 Dec;9(9):504-513.