Rehabilitation Research and Development, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA.
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Nov;63(11):1604-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02104.x.
To explore clinicians' perspectives influencing the under-diagnosis and management of patients with vestibular impairment (VI).
Data were collected using open-ended, semi-structured interviews with 18 clinical providers from primary care, neurology, otolaryngology and audiology affiliated with the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Atlanta, Georgia, from January to September 2007. Topics discussed included healthcare experiences for dizzy patients with possible VI, and perceived barriers and facilitators for clinical practice according to published guidelines. The constant comparison method was used for qualitative content analysis.
Clinicians rarely, if ever, diagnosed VI themselves or were aware of vestibular rehabilitation as the appropriate treatment for vestibular disorders. They infrequently performed bedside tests for positional nystagmus or vestibular hypofunction to identify VI and almost never performed canalith repositioning. Not uncommonly, they ordered a wide variety of diagnostic tests, such as neuroimaging, cardiac studies and audiograms, prior to make referral to a specialist, if they made referral at all. Perceived barriers to identifying VI in patients and giving treatment consistent with published recommendations commonly included lack of knowledge and training, perceived time constraints in clinic and difficulties with dizzy patients giving vague descriptions of their symptoms.
Perceptions of lacking knowledge in caring for patients with possible VI were experienced by clinicians both in primary and specialty care. Clinicians were frequently unaware of the concept of vestibular rehabilitation. Many wanted to learn more to improve healthcare delivery for their patients. Education appears necessary not only for enhancing patient therapeutic benefit, but also for minimising costs for unnecessary physician hours and diagnostic tests.
探讨影响前庭功能障碍(VI)患者漏诊和管理的临床医生观点。
2007 年 1 月至 9 月,从佐治亚州亚特兰大退伍军人管理局医疗中心的初级保健、神经病学、耳鼻喉科和听力学的 18 名临床医生那里收集了使用开放式、半结构化访谈获得的数据。讨论的主题包括可能患有 VI 的头晕患者的医疗保健经验,以及根据已发表的指南,对临床实践的感知障碍和促进因素。采用恒定比较法进行定性内容分析。
临床医生很少自行诊断 VI,也不知道前庭康复是前庭疾病的适当治疗方法。他们很少进行体位性眼球震颤或前庭功能低下的床边检查来识别 VI,几乎从不进行管结石复位。他们经常在转介给专科医生之前,开各种诊断性检查,如神经影像学、心脏研究和听力图,即使他们转介了。识别患者中的 VI 并给予与已发表建议一致的治疗的常见障碍包括缺乏知识和培训、诊所中感知到的时间限制以及头晕患者难以对其症状进行模糊描述。
初级保健和专科保健的临床医生都经历过对照顾可能患有 VI 的患者缺乏知识的看法。临床医生经常不知道前庭康复的概念。许多人希望学习更多知识,以改善患者的医疗服务。教育不仅对于增强患者的治疗效益,而且对于减少不必要的医生工时和诊断性检查费用都是必要的。