Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology, Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurophysiopatology, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", 20133 Milan, Italy.
Neurol Clin. 2009 Nov;27(4):993-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2009.06.006.
Data on clinical teratogenicity are at best derived from carefully conducted observational studies, whereas randomized, controlled trials have no place in this research area. We can only expect level B recommendations and lower. New relevant information has become available during the last 5 years on pregnancy outcomes with 3 of the most frequently used AEDs: carbamazepine, valproate, and lamotrigine. It seems that birth defect rates with arbamazepine monotherapy are lower than previously thought. In some large studies rates are only marginally increased compared with different control populations. More recent data do not suggest adverse effects of carbamazepine on cognitive development. The overall prevalence of malformations in association with lamotrigine exposure seems to be similar to that of carbamazepine. The only available prospective study on cognition does not indicate any adverse effects of lamotrigine. Malformation rates with valproate have consistently been found to be 2 to 3 times higher compared with carbamazepine or lamotrigine. More limited data also suggest adverse effects of high doses of valproate on cognitive development of the exposed child. For newer generation AEDs other than lamotrigine, data are still too limited to determine the risks for birth defects and are nonexisting with respect to possible adverse effects on cognitive development. Doses are important, and evidence is lacking for higher risks with valproate compared with other AEDs if doses are less than 800 to 1000 mg/d. Confounding factors contribute to some of the apparent differences between AEDs in pregnancy outcomes, and more data are needed, particularly concerning cognitive outcomes and specific birth defects. Based on these observations, valproate should not be a first-line AED for women who are considering pregnancy. In this situation this drug is best avoided if other effective but safer AEDs can be found for each individual woman's seizure disorder. Based on pregnancy outcome data, carbamazepine seems comparatively safe and a reasonable first-line choice in localization-related epilepsy. Alternatives are less clear in idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Lamotrigine seems comparatively safe, but its use in pregnancy is complicated by pharmacokinetic changes and risks of breakthrough seizures. The experience with use of levetiracetam and topiramate during pregnancy is still insufficient. Any attempt to change drugs should be completed and evaluated before conception; withdrawals or other major changes should be avoided during pregnancy. These conclusions are largely in line with the recently published report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.
关于临床致畸性的数据充其量是从精心设计的观察性研究中得出的,而随机对照试验在这一研究领域没有地位。我们只能期望得到 B 级建议,而且级别更低。在过去的 5 年中,有关 3 种最常用的抗癫痫药物(卡马西平、丙戊酸和拉莫三嗪)的妊娠结局有了新的相关信息。似乎卡马西平单药治疗的出生缺陷率低于先前的预期。在一些大型研究中,与不同的对照人群相比,其发生率仅略有增加。最近的数据并未表明卡马西平对认知发育有不良影响。与拉莫三嗪暴露相关的畸形总体发生率似乎与卡马西平相似。唯一一项关于认知功能的前瞻性研究并未表明拉莫三嗪有任何不良影响。与卡马西平或拉莫三嗪相比,丙戊酸的畸形发生率一直高 2 至 3 倍。更有限的数据还表明,高剂量丙戊酸对暴露儿童的认知发育有不良影响。对于拉莫三嗪以外的新一代抗癫痫药物,数据仍然过于有限,无法确定出生缺陷的风险,而且对于认知发育可能产生的不良影响尚无数据。剂量很重要,如果丙戊酸的剂量低于 800 至 1000 毫克/天,与其他抗癫痫药物相比,缺乏证据表明其风险更高。混杂因素导致抗癫痫药物在妊娠结局方面存在一些明显差异,需要更多的数据,特别是关于认知结局和特定出生缺陷的信息。基于这些观察结果,丙戊酸不应作为正在考虑怀孕的女性的一线抗癫痫药物。如果能为每个女性的癫痫发作找到其他有效但更安全的抗癫痫药物,这种药物最好避免。基于妊娠结局数据,卡马西平在与定位相关的癫痫中似乎相对安全,是合理的一线选择。在特发性全面性癫痫中,替代药物则不太明确。拉莫三嗪似乎相对安全,但由于药代动力学变化和突破性发作的风险,其在妊娠期间的使用较为复杂。在妊娠期间使用左乙拉西坦和托吡酯的经验仍然不足。任何改变药物的尝试都应在受孕前完成并进行评估;应避免在妊娠期间停药或进行其他重大改变。这些结论与美国神经病学学会质量标准小组委员会和治疗与技术小组委员会以及美国癫痫协会最近发表的报告基本一致。