Whitley R, Arvin A, Prober C, Burchett S, Corey L, Powell D, Plotkin S, Starr S, Alford C, Connor J
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama, Birmingham.
N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 14;324(7):444-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102143240703.
Despite the use of vidarabine, herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in neonates continues to be a disease of high morbidity and mortality. We undertook a controlled trial comparing vidarabine with acyclovir for the treatment of neonatal HSV infection.
Babies less than one month of age with virologically confirmed HSV infection were randomly and blindly assigned to receive either intravenous vidarabine (30 mg per kilogram of body weight per day; n = 95) or acyclovir (30 mg per kilogram per day; n = 107) for 10 days. Actuarial rates of mortality and morbidity among the survivors after one year were compared overall and according to the extent of the disease at entry into the study (infection confined to the skin, eyes, or mouth; encephalitis; or disseminated disease).
After adjustment for differences between groups in the extent of disease, there was no difference between vidarabine and acyclovir in either morbidity (P = 0.83) or mortality (P = 0.27). None of the 85 babies with disease confined to the skin, eyes, or mouth died. Of the 31 babies in this group who were treated with vidarabine and followed for a year, 88 percent (22 of 25) were judged to be developing normally after one year, as compared with 98 percent (45 of 46) of the 54 treated with acyclovir (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -4 to 24). For the 71 babies with encephalitis, mortality was 14 percent with vidarabine (5 of 36) and with acyclovir (5 of 35); of the survivors, 43 percent (13 of 30) and 29 percent (8 of 28), respectively, were developing normally after one year (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -11 to 39). For the 46 babies with disseminated disease, mortality was 50 percent (14 of 28) with vidarabine and 61 percent (11 of 18) with acyclovir (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -20 to 40); of the survivors, 58 percent (7 of 12) and 60 percent (3 of 5), respectively, were judged to be developing normally after one year (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -40 to 50). Both medications were without serious toxic effects.
In this multicenter, randomized, blinded study there were no differences in outcome between vidarabine and acyclovir in the treatment of neonatal HSV infection. The study lacked statistical power to determine whether there were sizable differences within the subgroups of those with localized HSV, encephalitis, or disseminated disease.
尽管使用了阿糖腺苷,但新生儿单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)感染仍然是一种高发病率和高死亡率的疾病。我们进行了一项对照试验,比较阿糖腺苷与阿昔洛韦治疗新生儿HSV感染的效果。
对病毒学确诊为HSV感染的1月龄以下婴儿进行随机、盲法分组,分别接受静脉注射阿糖腺苷(每日每千克体重30mg;n = 95)或阿昔洛韦(每日每千克体重30mg;n = 107)治疗10天。比较两组患儿1年后幸存者的总体死亡率和发病率,并根据研究入组时疾病的严重程度(感染局限于皮肤、眼睛或口腔;脑炎;或播散性疾病)进行比较。
在对两组疾病严重程度差异进行校正后,阿糖腺苷与阿昔洛韦在发病率(P = 0.83)或死亡率(P = 0.27)方面均无差异。85例感染局限于皮肤、眼睛或口腔的婴儿均未死亡。在该组接受阿糖腺苷治疗并随访1年的31例婴儿中,88%(25例中的22例)在1年后被判定发育正常,而接受阿昔洛韦治疗的54例婴儿中有98%(46例中的45例)发育正常(差异的95%置信区间为-4至24)。对于71例患有脑炎的婴儿,阿糖腺苷治疗组的死亡率为14%(36例中的5例),阿昔洛韦治疗组为14%(35例中的5例);在幸存者中,1年后分别有43%(30例中的13例)和29%(28例中的8例)发育正常(差异的95%置信区间为-11至39)。对于46例患有播散性疾病的婴儿,阿糖腺苷治疗组的死亡率为50%(28例中的14例),阿昔洛韦治疗组为61%(18例中的11例)(差异的95%置信区间为-20至40);在幸存者中,1年后分别有58%(12例中的7例)和60%(5例中的3例)被判定发育正常(差异的95%置信区间为-40至50)。两种药物均无严重毒副作用。
在这项多中心、随机、盲法研究中,阿糖腺苷与阿昔洛韦治疗新生儿HSV感染的疗效无差异。该研究缺乏统计学效力来确定在HSV局部感染、脑炎或播散性疾病亚组中是否存在显著差异。