Pang Marco Y C, Eng Janice J, Lin Kwan-Hwa, Tang Pei-Fang, Hung Chihya, Wang Yen-Ho
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(13):1068-73. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0455.
To determine factors influencing disease-management self-efficacy in individuals with spinal cord injury.
A cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Forty-nine community-dwelling individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (mean age 44 years) participated in the study.
Each subject was evaluated for disease-management self-efficacy (Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease), depression (10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), pain interference (Pain Interference Scale), and availability of support (Interpersonal Support Evaluation List short form). Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the relative contributions of these factors to disease-management self-efficacy.
The mean disease-management self-efficacy score was 6.5 out of 10 (standard deviation 1.6). Bivariate correlation analysis showed that higher self-efficacy was significantly correlated with longer time since injury (r = 0.367, p = 0.010), better social support (r = 0.434, p = 0.002), lower pain interference (r = -0.589, p <0.001), and less severe depressive symptoms (r=-0.463, p=0.001). In multiple regression analysis, only lower pain interference and less severe depressive symptoms were significantly associated with higher disease-management self-efficacy (F 4,44=10.249, R2=0.482, p<0.001).
Disease-management self-efficacy is suboptimal in many community-living people with spinal cord injury. This research suggests that rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury should include self-efficacy-enhancing strategies. Alleviation of depressive symptoms and pain self-management may be important for improving disease-management self-efficacy in this population, but this requires further study.
确定影响脊髓损伤患者疾病管理自我效能的因素。
一项横断面研究。
受试者/患者:49名社区居住的慢性脊髓损伤患者(平均年龄44岁)参与了该研究。
对每位受试者进行疾病管理自我效能(慢性病管理自我效能)、抑郁(10项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表)、疼痛干扰(疼痛干扰量表)和支持可用性(人际支持评估量表简表)评估。进行多元回归分析以确定这些因素对疾病管理自我效能的相对贡献。
疾病管理自我效能的平均得分为6.5分(满分10分,标准差1.6)。双变量相关分析表明,较高的自我效能与受伤后时间较长(r = 0.367,p = 0.010)、更好的社会支持(r = 0.434,p = 0.002)、较低的疼痛干扰(r = -0.589,p <0.001)和较轻的抑郁症状(r = -0.463,p = 0.001)显著相关。在多元回归分析中,只有较低的疼痛干扰和较轻的抑郁症状与较高的疾病管理自我效能显著相关(F 4,44 = 10.249,R2 = 0.482,p <0.001)。
许多社区居住的脊髓损伤患者的疾病管理自我效能不理想。本研究表明,脊髓损伤患者的康复应包括提高自我效能的策略。减轻抑郁症状和疼痛自我管理可能对提高该人群的疾病管理自我效能很重要,但这需要进一步研究。