Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 8, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jan;95(1):238-45. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1850. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
Pheochromocytomas can usually be confirmed or excluded using currently available biochemical tests of catecholamine excess. Follow-up tests are, nevertheless, often required to distinguish false-positive from true-positive results. The glucagon stimulation test represents one such test; its diagnostic utility is, however, unclear.
The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic power of the glucagon test to exclude or confirm pheochromocytoma.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Glucagon stimulation tests were carried out at three specialist referral centers in 64 patients with pheochromocytoma, 38 patients in whom the tumor was excluded, and in a reference group of 36 healthy volunteers.
Plasma concentrations of norepinephrine and epinephrine were measured before and after glucagon administration. Several absolute and relative test criteria were used for calculating diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Expression of the glucagon receptor was examined in pheochromocytoma tumor tissue from a subset of patients.
Larger than 3-fold increases in plasma norepinephrine after glucagon strongly predicted the presence of a pheochromocytoma (100% specificity and positive predictive value). However, irrespective of the various criteria examined, glucagon-provoked increases in plasma catecholamines revealed the presence of the tumor in less than 50% of affected patients. Diagnostic sensitivity was particularly low in patients with pheochromocytomas due to von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. Tumors from these patients showed no significant expression of the glucagon receptor.
The glucagon stimulation test offers insufficient diagnostic sensitivity for reliable exclusion or confirmation of pheochromocytoma. Because of this and the risk of hypertensive complications, the test should be abandoned in routine clinical practice.
嗜铬细胞瘤通常可以使用现有的儿茶酚胺过量的生化测试来确认或排除。然而,通常需要进行随访测试以区分假阳性和真阳性结果。胰高血糖素刺激试验就是这样一种测试;然而,其诊断效用尚不清楚。
本研究旨在确定胰高血糖素试验排除或确认嗜铬细胞瘤的诊断能力。
设计、设置和受试者:在三个专科转诊中心对 64 例嗜铬细胞瘤患者、38 例肿瘤排除患者和 36 名健康志愿者参考组进行了胰高血糖素刺激试验。
在胰高血糖素给药前后测量血浆去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素浓度。使用几种绝对和相对的测试标准来计算诊断的敏感性和特异性。从一部分患者的嗜铬细胞瘤肿瘤组织中检查了胰高血糖素受体的表达。
胰高血糖素后血浆去甲肾上腺素增加 3 倍以上强烈预测嗜铬细胞瘤的存在(100%特异性和阳性预测值)。然而,无论检查的各种标准如何,胰高血糖素引起的血浆儿茶酚胺增加仅在不到 50%的受影响患者中发现肿瘤的存在。由于 von Hippel-Lindau 综合征导致的嗜铬细胞瘤患者的诊断敏感性特别低。这些患者的肿瘤没有明显表达胰高血糖素受体。
胰高血糖素刺激试验提供的诊断敏感性不足以可靠地排除或确认嗜铬细胞瘤。由于这一点以及高血压并发症的风险,该测试应在常规临床实践中放弃。