相似文献
1
Faculty guide to the institutional review board process.
Nurse Educ. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):244-8. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181bc7450.
2
The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review?
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;18(2):213-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AACN.0000269265.29665.29.
3
The Office of Human Research Protections.
Clin Nurse Spec. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):268. doi: 10.1097/01.NUR.0000325380.14965.39.
4
Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
Hum Res Rep. 2003 Jun;18(6):6-7.
5
NAPNAP position statement on protection of children involved in research studies.
J Pediatr Health Care. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(1):A17-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2009.08.012.
6
Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
J Health Care Law Policy. 2005;8(2):264-330.
7
Working with human research protections.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(3):265-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04048.x.
8
Ethics of research.
J Ren Care. 2008 Sep;34(3):111. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2008.00030.x.
9
Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(1):88-104.
10
A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
Nurs Ethics. 2008 Mar;15(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/0969733007086021.
Zotero 插件