Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者两点辨别觉与其他感觉丧失指标之间的相关性。

Correlation between two-point discrimination with other measures of sensory loss in diabetes mellitus patients.

作者信息

Periyasamy R, Manivannan M, Narayanamurthy V B

出版信息

Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2008 Jul;28(3):71-8. doi: 10.4103/0973-3930.44076.

Abstract

Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most important factors for foot ulceration in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Among different sensibility measures of neuropathy, two-point discrimination (TPD) has been suggested as a reliable method; however, the correlation of TPD with other well-known measures is not known. We measured the loss of protective sensation using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments (SWMF), hardness of the foot sole using shore meter (sh), power ratio (PR) using pedopowergraph and TPD using esthesiometer in foot areas of both left and right legs in 14 DM subjects. We have found no correlation either between TPD and shore values (sh) or between TPD and PR. The SWMF (10 g) is found not to provide any additional value in measuring loss of sensation in comparison to TPD. The TPD appears to be measuring different property of the foot compared to other measures. The mechanism of this independence is not well understood and more investigation is required to understand the mechanism.

摘要

糖尿病神经病变是糖尿病(DM)患者足部溃疡的最重要因素之一。在神经病变的不同敏感性测量方法中,两点辨别觉(TPD)被认为是一种可靠的方法;然而,TPD与其他知名测量方法之间的相关性尚不清楚。我们使用Semmes-Weinstein单丝(SWMF)测量了14名糖尿病受试者左右腿足部区域的保护性感觉丧失,使用肖氏硬度计测量了足底硬度(sh),使用足功率图测量了功率比(PR),并使用触觉测量仪测量了TPD。我们发现TPD与肖氏硬度值(sh)之间以及TPD与PR之间均无相关性。与TPD相比,发现SWMF(10 g)在测量感觉丧失方面没有提供任何额外价值。与其他测量方法相比,TPD似乎在测量足部的不同特性。这种独立性的机制尚不清楚,需要更多的研究来了解其机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/404f/2772015/3052f53e2833/IJDDC-28-71-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验