• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在问责制和透明度呼声日益高涨的时代的共享医疗监管:美国、加拿大和英国再认证情况比较

Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Shaw Kirstyn, Cassel Christine K, Black Carol, Levinson Wendy

机构信息

Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, London, England.

出版信息

JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):2008-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1620.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2009.1620
PMID:19903922
Abstract

In the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, the medical profession is accountable to the public for the delivery and quality of care provided to patients. Traditionally, this accountability has been achieved through the development and maintenance of professional standards established by the profession itself-self-regulation. Medical self-regulation is being re-examined by regulators, government, and the profession in response to a range of drivers including payers seeking ways to hold physicians accountable for cost-effective care; patients seeking more information about their physician's qualifications; and the emergence of a number of high-profile cases of unacceptable medical practice. This article outlines the current state of medical regulation in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom and highlights the increasing external pressure on the self-regulatory framework that is leading to a shift toward shared regulation between the profession and other stakeholders.

摘要

在美国、加拿大和英国,医疗行业需就为患者提供的医疗服务及其质量向公众负责。传统上,这种问责是通过该行业自身制定并维持的专业标准——自我监管来实现的。监管机构、政府和医疗行业正在重新审视医疗自我监管,这是对一系列驱动因素做出的回应,这些因素包括付款方寻求让医生为具有成本效益的医疗服务负责的方法;患者寻求更多有关其医生资质的信息;以及出现了一些备受瞩目的不可接受的医疗行为案例。本文概述了美国、加拿大和英国医疗监管的现状,并强调了自我监管框架面临的越来越大的外部压力,这种压力正导致向行业与其他利益相关者之间的共同监管转变。

相似文献

1
Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.在问责制和透明度呼声日益高涨的时代的共享医疗监管:美国、加拿大和英国再认证情况比较
JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):2008-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1620.
2
The purpose and limits to professional self-regulation.职业自我监管的目的与局限。
JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):2032-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1644.
3
Why is U.K. medicine no longer a self-regulating profession? The role of scandals involving "bad apple" doctors.为什么英国的医学不再是一个自我监管的专业?涉及“坏苹果”医生的丑闻的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Nov;73(10):1452-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.031. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
4
From global rationing to target setting in the U.K.从全球配给到英国的目标设定
Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Jul-Aug;19(4):S3-4.
5
An ethical framework for the responsible leadership of accountable care organizations.负责医疗组织的责任型领导的伦理框架。
Am J Med Qual. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):189-94. doi: 10.1177/1062860611421226. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
6
The role of physician specialty board certification status in the quality movement.医生专业委员会认证状态在质量改进运动中的作用。
JAMA. 2004 Sep 1;292(9):1038-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.9.1038.
7
Future of board certification in a new era of public accountability.新时代公众问责制下的董事会认证的未来。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;23 Suppl 1:S32-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.S1.090283.
8
The end of autonomy? Reflections on the postprofessional physician.自主性的终结?对后专业时代医生的思考。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1992 Winter;17(1):63-72. doi: 10.1097/00004010-199201710-00008.
9
Practice guidelines: role of economics and physicians.实践指南:经济学与医生的作用
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Summer;13(3):141-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.141.
10
Ensuring high-quality patient care: the role of accreditation, licensure, specialty certification and revalidation in medicine.确保高质量的患者护理:认证、许可、专业认证及医学再认证的作用。
Med Educ. 2014 Jan;48(1):75-86. doi: 10.1111/medu.12286.

引用本文的文献

1
An exploration into physician and surgeon data sensemaking: a qualitative systematic review using thematic synthesis.探索医师和外科医生的数据理解:使用主题综合的定性系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Sep 28;22(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01997-1.
2
Maintenance of professional competence in Ireland: a national survey of doctors' attitudes and experiences.爱尔兰的专业能力维护:医生态度和经验的全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 10;10(12):e042183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042183.
3
Doctors' attitudes to, beliefs about, and experiences of the regulation of professional competence: a scoping review protocol.
医生对专业能力监管的态度、信念和经验:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 22;8(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1132-3.
4
Primary care performance of alternatively licenced physicians in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional study using administrative data.加拿大安大略省另类许可医师的初级保健表现:使用行政数据的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 11;9(6):e026296. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026296.
5
Redeveloping a workplace-based assessment program for physicians using Kane's validity framework.运用凯恩效度框架为医生重新开发基于工作场所的评估项目。
Can Med Educ J. 2018 Jul 27;9(3):e14-e24. eCollection 2018 Jul.
6
A case for revisiting peer review: Implications for professional self-regulation and quality improvement.重新审视同行评审:对专业自律和质量改进的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199961. eCollection 2018.
7
Doctors on the move: a European case study on the key characteristics of national recertification systems.流动中的医生:关于国家再认证系统关键特征的欧洲案例研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 17;8(4):e019963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019963.
8
"Certified … now what?" On the Challenges of Lifelong Learning: Report from an AMEE 2017 Symposium.“已获认证……接下来呢?”论终身学习的挑战:AMEE 2017研讨会报告
J Eur CME. 2018 Jan 25;7(1):1428025. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2018.1428025. eCollection 2018.
9
The implementation of medical revalidation: an assessment using normalisation process theory.医学再验证的实施:基于规范化过程理论的评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2710-5.
10
National programmes for validating physician competence and fitness for practice: a scoping review.验证医生执业能力和适任性的国家计划:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 15;6(4):e010368. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010368.