Afdeling Oncologie en Hematologie, Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis Aalst, Aalst, Belgium.
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Jul;18(7):847-58. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0718-z. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
The goal of this study is to test the validity of RESPOND, a web-based decision support system to assess and manage anemia in cancer patients as per the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines. The intraclass correlation metrics for the algorithmic definitions were reported previously. Reported here are the concurrent validity, the extent to which clinicians' anemia management is guidelines-congruent when using the system; and discriminant validity, the extent to which clinicians practice in congruence with guidelines when vs. when not using the system.
Hybrid matched design with precohort (retrospective; clinicians not using RESPOND) and postcohort (prospective; clinicians using RESPOND) of anemic patients matched on cancer type and chemotherapy regimen and followed up over 4 months after treatment initiation with erythropoietic proteins (34 patients per cohort; total N = 68). Congruence scores quantified the extent to which anemia management was congruent with the EORTC guidelines (range 0-10).
Hemoglobin (Hb) increased significantly for both cohorts, but the postcohort group showed more rapid rate of Hb increase over time (p < 0.006), higher Hb by visit 4 (p = 0.007), and greater Hb increase by visit 4 (p = 0.006). Concurrent validity was high with mean postcohort congruence scores of 8.18 +/- 1.38. Discriminant validity was inferred from statistically significant differences in mean congruence scores between cohorts (p < 0.001) and from the postcohort having odds ratios of 3.64 for patients to reach Hb >or= 11 g/dL and 2.91 to achieve Hb >or= 12 g/dL.
RESPOND, a validated computerized clinical guidance system with an incremental effect beyond the pharmacotherapeutic effect of erythropoietic proteins, offers clinicians accurate and safe guidance in managing anemia in cancer patients.
本研究旨在测试 RESPOND 的有效性,RESPOND 是一种基于网络的决策支持系统,用于根据欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)指南评估和管理癌症患者的贫血。先前已经报道了该算法定义的组内相关系数。本研究报告了同时有效性,即当使用该系统时,临床医生的贫血管理与指南一致的程度;以及判别有效性,即在使用和不使用该系统时,临床医生的实践与指南一致的程度。
采用混合匹配设计,包括前瞻性队列(使用 RESPOND 的临床医生)和回顾性队列(未使用 RESPOND 的临床医生),根据癌症类型和化疗方案对贫血患者进行匹配,并在接受促红细胞生成蛋白治疗后进行 4 个月的随访(每个队列 34 例患者,总 N = 68 例)。一致性评分量化了贫血管理与 EORTC 指南一致的程度(范围 0-10)。
两个队列的血红蛋白(Hb)均显著升高,但后队列组在时间上显示出更快的 Hb 升高速度(p < 0.006),第 4 次就诊时 Hb 更高(p = 0.007),第 4 次就诊时 Hb 增加更多(p = 0.006)。同时有效性较高,后队列的平均一致性评分为 8.18 +/- 1.38。判别有效性是从队列之间的平均一致性评分存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)推断出来的,并且后队列的患者达到 Hb >或= 11 g/dL 的比值比为 3.64,达到 Hb >或= 12 g/dL 的比值比为 2.91。
RESPOND 是一种经过验证的计算机化临床指导系统,除了促红细胞生成蛋白的治疗作用外,还具有增量效应,为临床医生在管理癌症患者的贫血方面提供了准确和安全的指导。