Suppr超能文献

在儿童哮喘发作期间,与临床医生进行院前电话沟通是否会使家长更恰当地给药?

Does pre-hospital telephone communication with a clinician result in more appropriate medication administration by parents during childhood asthma exacerbations?

作者信息

Garro A C, Fearon D, Koinis-Mitchell D, McQuaid E L

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, 71 Vassar Avenue, Providence, RI 02906, USA.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2009 Nov;46(9):916-20. doi: 10.3109/02770900903229644.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute asthma guidelines recommend that parents communicate with a clinician during childhood asthma exacerbations when symptoms worsen or do not improve with initial therapy. This study tested the hypothesis that communication by parents with a clinician before an Emergency Department visit was associated with more appropriate medication administration for children with asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using data gathered from parents of children presenting with an asthma exacerbation to the emergency department. The communicating cohort included parents who communicated by telephone with a clinician during the exacerbation and the non-communicating cohort included parents who did not. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to test three hypotheses; communication with a clinician is associated with (1) administration of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs), (2) increased dosing frequency of SABAs, and (3) administration of an oral corticosteroid.

RESULTS

A total of 199 subjects were enrolled, with 104 (52.3%) in the communicating and 95 (47.7%) in the non-communicating cohort. There was an association between communication and provider practice type, with children who received routine care from a private practice provider more likely to communicate with the clinician than children in hospital-based clinics or community health centers (Adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.7). Impoverished children and children insured by Medicaid were less likely to communicate with a clinician (controlling for provider type). Parents who communicated with a clinician were more likely to administer a SABA (adjusted OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3-9.4) and an oral corticosteroid (adjusted OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.4) but were not more likely to administer a SABA with increased dosing frequency (adjusted OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Parents of children with asthma exacerbations who communicated with clinicians were more likely to administer SABAs and an oral corticosteroid before bringing their child to an emergency department. Frequency of SABA dosing was not associated with communication. Clinicians providing telephone advice to parents need to provide explicit instructions about medication administration, emphasizing the frequency with which SABAs should be administered.

摘要

背景

美国国立心肺血液研究所的哮喘指南建议,在儿童哮喘急性发作时,如果症状恶化或初始治疗后没有改善,家长应与临床医生沟通。本研究检验了这样一个假设:在带孩子前往急诊科就诊之前,家长与临床医生进行沟通,这与哮喘急性发作儿童能更合理地用药有关。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用的数据来自因哮喘急性发作前往急诊科就诊儿童的家长。沟通组包括在急性发作期间通过电话与临床医生沟通的家长,非沟通组包括未进行沟通的家长。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来检验三个假设:与临床医生沟通与(1)使用短效β受体激动剂(SABA)、(2)增加SABA的给药频率、(3)使用口服糖皮质激素有关。

结果

总共招募了199名受试者,其中沟通组有104名(52.3%),非沟通组有95名(47.7%)。沟通与医疗服务提供者的执业类型之间存在关联,与在医院诊所或社区卫生中心就诊的儿童相比,接受私人执业提供者常规护理的儿童更有可能与临床医生沟通(调整后的比值比为1.9,95%置信区间为1.0 - 3.7)。贫困儿童和由医疗补助计划承保的儿童与临床医生沟通的可能性较小(控制医疗服务提供者类型)。与临床医生沟通的家长更有可能使用SABA(调整后的比值比为3.6,95%置信区间为1.3 - 9.4)和口服糖皮质激素(调整后的比值比为3.3,95%置信区间为1.3 - 8.4),但使用SABA时增加给药频率的可能性并没有更高(调整后的比值比为0.9,95%置信区间为0.5 - 1.6)。

结论

哮喘急性发作儿童的家长在带孩子前往急诊科之前与临床医生进行沟通,更有可能使用SABA和口服糖皮质激素。SABA给药频率与沟通无关。为家长提供电话咨询的临床医生需要就用药给予明确指导,强调SABA的给药频率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验