• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[骨锚式助听器手术中皮瓣技术与U形移植技术皮肤并发症的比较]

[Comparison of skin complications between dermatome and U-graft technique in BAHA surgery].

作者信息

Tamarit Conejeros José Manuel, Dalmau Galofre José, Murcia Puchades Virginia, Pons Rocher Francisco, Fernández Martínez Sergio, Estrems Navas Paloma

机构信息

Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, España.

出版信息

Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2009 Nov-Dec;60(6):422-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.otorri.2009.06.005
PMID:19909718
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The most common postoperative complications related to BAHA prosthetic surgery are skin complications. In this study we compare and evaluate these reactions with two different surgical techniques, the BAHA dermatome and the U-graft technique.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Fifty-three patients who underwent implantation of a BAHA at our hospital between 2001 and 2008 were studied. The comparison of the skin reactions was carried out according to Holgers' classification. We also recorded the number of cures required until the skin was stabilized.

RESULTS

We used the dermatome in 27 patients and the U-graft in 26 patients. In the dermatome group we have reported a total of 74% of skin reactions (20 patients), in contrast with the 34% (9 patients) observed in the U-graft group. The average number of cures for patients in the dermatome group and those in the U-graft group was 4.1 and 2.7, respectively. The differences found were statistically significant and had a 95% confidence interval.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the use of the electric dermatome in BAHA surgery offers a higher incidence of skin complications in comparison with the U-graft technique. Since both techniques have a number of advantages and disadvantages, it may be that the selection of the technique to be employed according the individual characteristics of each patient may offer better results in the future.

摘要

引言与目的

与骨锚式助听器(BAHA)假体手术相关的最常见术后并发症是皮肤并发症。在本研究中,我们比较并评估了两种不同手术技术(BAHA皮刀技术和U型移植技术)引发的这些反应。

材料与方法

对2001年至2008年间在我院接受BAHA植入手术的53例患者进行了研究。根据霍尔格斯分类法对皮肤反应进行比较。我们还记录了皮肤稳定前所需的治愈次数。

结果

我们对27例患者使用了皮刀技术,对26例患者使用了U型移植技术。皮刀技术组共报告了74%的皮肤反应(20例患者),相比之下,U型移植技术组为34%(9例患者)。皮刀技术组患者和U型移植技术组患者的平均治愈次数分别为4.1次和2.7次。发现的差异具有统计学意义,且置信区间为95%。

结论

根据我们的经验,与U型移植技术相比,在BAHA手术中使用电动皮刀会导致更高的皮肤并发症发生率。由于两种技术都有一些优缺点,未来根据每位患者的个体特征选择使用的技术可能会取得更好的效果。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of skin complications between dermatome and U-graft technique in BAHA surgery].[骨锚式助听器手术中皮瓣技术与U形移植技术皮肤并发症的比较]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2009 Nov-Dec;60(6):422-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
2
Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: a comparison between the U-graft technique and the BAHA dermatome.骨锚式助听器(BAHA)手术后的皮肤反应:U型移植技术与BAHA皮刀的比较
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Dec;29(8):1109-14. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318185fabc.
3
Bone-anchored hearing aid: a comparison of surgical techniques.骨锚式助听器:手术技术比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jan;31(1):129-35. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c29fec.
4
Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.打孔与钻孔:通过微小皮肤打孔切口植入骨锚式听力装置与使用皮刀及软组织减容植入法的比较
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Mar;125(3):199-206. doi: 10.1177/0003489415606447. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
5
Clinical outcome of the simplified surgical technique for BAHA implantation.骨锚式助听器植入简化手术技术的临床结果
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Dec;29(8):1100-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818599b8.
6
Single-stage BAHA implantation in adults and children: is it safe?成人和儿童单阶段骨锚式助听器植入:安全吗?
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 May;138(5):662-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.12.019.
7
BAHA implant: implantation technique and complications.骨锚式助听器植入:植入技术及并发症。
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014 Feb;131(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
8
Canal atresia: "surgery or implantable hearing devices? The expert's question is revisited".耳道闭锁:“手术还是可植入式听力设备?专家的问题再探讨”
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Mar;71(3):367-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
9
Wound related complications following full thickness skin graft versus split thickness skin graft on patients with bone anchored hearing aids.骨锚式助听器患者接受全厚皮片移植与中厚皮片移植后的伤口相关并发症
Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Aug;30(4):324-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.01029.x.
10
Bone-anchored hearing aids: incidence and management of postoperative complications.骨锚式助听器:术后并发症的发生率及处理
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Feb;28(2):213-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31802c74c4.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.经皮骨锚式听力植入手术:皮片刀与线性切口技术
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4210-3. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
2
A systematic review on skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in relation to surgical techniques.一项关于骨锚式助听器皮肤并发症与手术技术相关性的系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Mar;273(3):559-65. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3436-1. Epub 2014 Dec 14.