Suppr超能文献

维利巴韦林与利巴韦林治疗 ViSER2 初治丙型肝炎患者的安全性和疗效:随机、双盲研究。

Safety and efficacy of viramidine versus ribavirin in ViSER2: randomized, double-blind study in therapy-naive hepatitis C patients.

机构信息

Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2010 Jan;52(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (standard of care for chronic hepatitis C virus [HCV]), can cause dose-limiting anemia in up to 22% of patients. Viramidine is associated with a lower incidence of anemia because of its liver-targeting properties.

METHODS

The efficacy and safety of viramidine versus ribavirin plus peg-IFN alfa-2a was assessed in patients with HCV. Randomized patients received peg-IFN alfa-2a 180 mcg with viramidine 600 mg twice daily or weight-based doses of ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg/day. Treatment duration was based on HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) genotype: genotype 2/3 and non-2/3 patients were treated for 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The primary efficacy end point was the non-inferiority of viramidine versus ribavirin (proportion of patients achieving sustained virologic response at week 24). The primary safety end point was the proportion of patients experiencing a hemoglobin event.

RESULTS

In total, 962 patients received peg-IFN alfa-2a with viramidine (n=644) or ribavirin (n=318). Sustained virologic response was achieved in 40% of viramidine-treated patients and 55% of ribavirin-treated patients (difference of proportions 0.150 [95% CI, 0.09, 0.21]). Improved efficacy was seen with higher viramidine exposure on a mg/kg basis. Viramidine was significantly superior to ribavirin in hemoglobin event rates (54% vs. 80%; p<0.001). Adverse event rates were similar between groups except for diarrhea (viramidine 29.5%; ribavirin 15.7%; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Viramidine 600 mg BID did not meet the primary efficacy non-inferiority end point but met the safety end point. Determination of a viramidine dosage that would yield superior efficacy over ribavirin is needed.

摘要

背景与目的

聚乙二醇干扰素(peg-IFN)联合利巴韦林(慢性丙型肝炎病毒[HCV]的标准治疗方法),可导致多达 22%的患者出现剂量限制的贫血。由于其肝脏靶向特性,维拉美汀与贫血的发生率较低有关。

方法

评估维拉美汀与利巴韦林联合聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 治疗 HCV 患者的疗效和安全性。随机分组的患者接受聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 180 mcg 联合维拉美汀 600 mg 每日两次或根据体重给予利巴韦林 1000 或 1200 mg/天。治疗持续时间根据 HCV 核糖核酸(RNA)基因型而定:基因型 2/3 和非 2/3 患者的治疗时间分别为 24 周和 48 周。主要疗效终点是维拉美汀与利巴韦林相比的非劣效性(第 24 周时实现持续病毒学应答的患者比例)。主要安全性终点是血红蛋白事件患者的比例。

结果

共有 962 例患者接受了聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 联合维拉美汀(n=644)或利巴韦林(n=318)治疗。维拉美汀治疗组的持续病毒学应答率为 40%,利巴韦林治疗组为 55%(比例差异 0.150[95%CI,0.09,0.21])。以 mg/kg 为基础,维拉美汀的暴露量越高,疗效越好。血红蛋白事件发生率维拉美汀明显优于利巴韦林(54%比 80%;p<0.001)。除腹泻(维拉美汀 29.5%;利巴韦林 15.7%;p<0.0001)外,两组的不良反应发生率相似。

结论

维拉美汀 600 mg 每日两次的剂量未达到主要疗效非劣效性终点,但达到了安全性终点。需要确定一种维拉美汀剂量,使其疗效优于利巴韦林。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验