Suppr超能文献

接触预防措施针对多重耐药菌:当前的建议和实际做法。

Contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: Current recommendations and actual practice.

机构信息

Center for Interdisciplinary Research to Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact precautions are recommended for interactions with patients colonized/infected with multidrug-resistant organisms; however, actual rates of implementation of contact precautions are unknown.

METHODS

Observers recorded the availability of supplies and staff/visitor adherence to contact precautions at rooms of patients indicated for contact precautions. Data were collected at 3 sites in a New York City hospital network.

RESULTS

Contact precautions signs were present for 85.4% of indicated patients. The largest proportions were indicated for isolation for vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cultures. Isolation carts were available outside 93.7% to 96.7% of rooms displaying signs, and personal protective equipment was available at rates of 49.4% to 72.1% for gloves (all sizes: small, medium, and large) and 91.7% to 95.2% for gowns. Overall adherence rates on room entry and exit, respectively, were 19.4% and 48.4% for hand hygiene, 67.5% and 63.5% for gloves, and 67.9% and 77.1% for gowns. Adherence was significantly better in intensive care units (P < .05) and by patient care staff (P < .05), and patient care staff compliance with one contact precautions behavior was predictive of adherence to additional behaviors (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the recommendation that methods to monitor contact precautions and identify and correct nonadherent practices should be a standard component of infection prevention and control programs.

摘要

背景

接触预防措施被推荐用于与携带/感染多药耐药菌的患者进行接触;然而,接触预防措施的实际实施率尚不清楚。

方法

观察者记录了在接触预防措施指示的患者病房中,供应品和员工/访客遵守接触预防措施的情况。数据在纽约市一家医院网络的 3 个地点收集。

结果

接触预防措施标志存在于 85.4%的指示患者中。最大比例的患者被指示进行万古霉素耐药肠球菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌培养的隔离。在显示标志的 93.7%至 96.7%的病房外可提供隔离车,手套(所有尺寸:小、中、大)的个人防护设备可用性分别为 49.4%至 72.1%,而长袍的可用性为 91.7%至 95.2%。进出房间时的总体遵守率分别为手卫生的 19.4%和 48.4%、手套的 67.5%和 63.5%以及长袍的 67.9%和 77.1%。在重症监护病房(P<.05)和由患者护理人员(P<.05)遵守情况更好,并且患者护理人员遵守一种接触预防措施行为与遵守其他行为(P<.001)呈正相关。

结论

我们的研究结果支持这样的建议,即监测接触预防措施并识别和纠正不遵守行为的方法应该成为感染预防和控制计划的标准组成部分。

相似文献

1
Contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: Current recommendations and actual practice.
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
2
Modified glove use for contact precautions: Health care workers' perceptions and acceptance.
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Aug;47(8):938-944. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 14;364(15):1407-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000373.
8
Discontinuing contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Mar;46(3):333-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.031. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
[Effectiveness and risks of isolation precautions in patients with MRSA and other multidrug-resistant bacteria].
Zentralbl Chir. 2010 Apr;135(2):124-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247328. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
10
Policies for Controlling Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in US Healthcare Facilities Reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2014.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;37(9):1105-8. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.139. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to Personal Protective Equipment practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study.
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 May 9;6(2):100369. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100369. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
What Not to Do with PPE: A Digital Application to Raise Awareness of Proper PPE Protocol.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1334:55-79. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76951-2_4.
5
Modeling Interventions to Reduce the Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Between Health Care Facilities in a Region.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119212. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19212.
8
An observational study to identify types of personal protective equipment breaches on inpatient wards.
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Sep;106(1):208-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

2
Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 1;48(1):1-12. doi: 10.1086/595011.
3
5
2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.007.
6
Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings, 2006.
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S165-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.006.
7
Dissemination of the CDC's Hand Hygiene Guideline and impact on infection rates.
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10):666-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.10.006.
9
Impact of contact and droplet precautions on the incidence of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;28(11):1261-6. doi: 10.1086/521658. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
10
Survey of isolation practices at a tertiary care pediatric hospital.
Am J Infect Control. 2007 May;35(4):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.03.012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验