• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接触预防措施针对多重耐药菌:当前的建议和实际做法。

Contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: Current recommendations and actual practice.

机构信息

Center for Interdisciplinary Research to Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.008
PMID:19913329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2827623/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact precautions are recommended for interactions with patients colonized/infected with multidrug-resistant organisms; however, actual rates of implementation of contact precautions are unknown.

METHODS

Observers recorded the availability of supplies and staff/visitor adherence to contact precautions at rooms of patients indicated for contact precautions. Data were collected at 3 sites in a New York City hospital network.

RESULTS

Contact precautions signs were present for 85.4% of indicated patients. The largest proportions were indicated for isolation for vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cultures. Isolation carts were available outside 93.7% to 96.7% of rooms displaying signs, and personal protective equipment was available at rates of 49.4% to 72.1% for gloves (all sizes: small, medium, and large) and 91.7% to 95.2% for gowns. Overall adherence rates on room entry and exit, respectively, were 19.4% and 48.4% for hand hygiene, 67.5% and 63.5% for gloves, and 67.9% and 77.1% for gowns. Adherence was significantly better in intensive care units (P < .05) and by patient care staff (P < .05), and patient care staff compliance with one contact precautions behavior was predictive of adherence to additional behaviors (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the recommendation that methods to monitor contact precautions and identify and correct nonadherent practices should be a standard component of infection prevention and control programs.

摘要

背景

接触预防措施被推荐用于与携带/感染多药耐药菌的患者进行接触;然而,接触预防措施的实际实施率尚不清楚。

方法

观察者记录了在接触预防措施指示的患者病房中,供应品和员工/访客遵守接触预防措施的情况。数据在纽约市一家医院网络的 3 个地点收集。

结果

接触预防措施标志存在于 85.4%的指示患者中。最大比例的患者被指示进行万古霉素耐药肠球菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌培养的隔离。在显示标志的 93.7%至 96.7%的病房外可提供隔离车,手套(所有尺寸:小、中、大)的个人防护设备可用性分别为 49.4%至 72.1%,而长袍的可用性为 91.7%至 95.2%。进出房间时的总体遵守率分别为手卫生的 19.4%和 48.4%、手套的 67.5%和 63.5%以及长袍的 67.9%和 77.1%。在重症监护病房(P<.05)和由患者护理人员(P<.05)遵守情况更好,并且患者护理人员遵守一种接触预防措施行为与遵守其他行为(P<.001)呈正相关。

结论

我们的研究结果支持这样的建议,即监测接触预防措施并识别和纠正不遵守行为的方法应该成为感染预防和控制计划的标准组成部分。

相似文献

1
Contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: Current recommendations and actual practice.接触预防措施针对多重耐药菌:当前的建议和实际做法。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
2
Modified glove use for contact precautions: Health care workers' perceptions and acceptance.改良手套在接触预防措施中的使用:医护人员的认知和接受程度。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Aug;47(8):938-944. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
3
A controlled trial of universal gloving versus contact precautions for preventing the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms.一项关于通用戴手套与接触预防措施预防多重耐药菌传播的对照试验。
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10):650-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.02.011.
4
Healthcare epidemiology: active surveillance cultures and contact precautions for control of multidrug-resistant organisms: ethical considerations.医疗保健流行病学:用于控制多重耐药菌的主动监测培养与接触预防措施:伦理考量
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 1;47(1):110-6. doi: 10.1086/588789.
5
Trial of universal gloving with emollient-impregnated gloves to promote skin health and prevent the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in a surgical intensive care unit.在外科重症监护病房中使用涂有保湿剂的手套进行普遍戴手套以促进皮肤健康并预防多重耐药菌传播的试验。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 May;31(5):491-7. doi: 10.1086/651671.
6
Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care.重症监护中减少耐药菌传播的干预措施。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 14;364(15):1407-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000373.
7
Optimizing Contact Precautions to Curb the Spread of Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria in Hospitals: A Multicenter Cohort Study to Identify Patient Characteristics and Healthcare Personnel Interactions Associated With Transmission of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.优化接触预防措施以遏制医院中抗生素耐药菌的传播:一项多中心队列研究,以确定与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌传播相关的患者特征和医护人员相互作用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(Suppl 3):S171-S177. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz621.
8
Discontinuing contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.停止接触预防措施用于多重耐药菌:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Mar;46(3):333-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.031. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
[Effectiveness and risks of isolation precautions in patients with MRSA and other multidrug-resistant bacteria].[耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌及其他多重耐药菌感染患者隔离预防措施的有效性与风险]
Zentralbl Chir. 2010 Apr;135(2):124-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247328. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
10
Policies for Controlling Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in US Healthcare Facilities Reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2014.美国医疗机构中耐多药生物体控制政策,2014年向国家医疗安全网络报告。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;37(9):1105-8. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.139. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to Personal Protective Equipment practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study.COVID-19大流行期间个人防护装备使用的依从性:一项试点研究。
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 May 9;6(2):100369. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100369. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Impact of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Intervention on Isolation Implementation in Prevention and Control of Multi-drug Resistance Infection.多学科协作干预对多重耐药感染防控中隔离措施实施的影响
Curr Med Sci. 2023 Feb;43(1):198-205. doi: 10.1007/s11596-023-2709-6. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Approaches to multidrug-resistant organism prevention and control in long-term care facilities for older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling the invasion of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus into hospitals.模拟社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌侵入医院的情况。
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 1;48(3):274-84. doi: 10.1086/595844.
2
Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America.有害病菌,无药可医:谨防“ESKAPE”!美国传染病学会的最新报告
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 1;48(1):1-12. doi: 10.1086/595011.
3
Recommendations for metrics for multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare settings: SHEA/HICPAC Position paper .
老年人长期护理机构中多重耐药菌预防和控制方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Jan 15;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-01044-0.
4
What Not to Do with PPE: A Digital Application to Raise Awareness of Proper PPE Protocol.《不要与个人防护装备(PPE)做什么:一个提高正确使用 PPE 协议意识的数字应用程序》
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1334:55-79. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76951-2_4.
5
Modeling Interventions to Reduce the Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Between Health Care Facilities in a Region.在一个地区的医疗机构之间减少耐多药生物体传播的干预措施建模。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119212. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19212.
6
How Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals Can Play an Important Role in Controlling Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a Region: A Simulation Modeling Study.长期急性护理医院如何在一个地区发挥控制耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科的重要作用:一项模拟建模研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Feb 1;190(3):448-458. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa247.
7
Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Infection Control Strategies to Reduce Hospital-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection.评价感染控制策略降低医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的成本效益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012522. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12522.
8
An observational study to identify types of personal protective equipment breaches on inpatient wards.一项旨在识别住院病房个人防护装备违规类型的观察性研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Sep;106(1):208-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
9
Knowing More of the Iceberg: How Detecting a Greater Proportion of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Carriers Influences Transmission.深入了解冰山一角:检测出更大比例的耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌携带者如何影响传播。
J Infect Dis. 2020 May 11;221(11):1782-1794. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz288.
10
Tracking the spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) through clinical cultures alone underestimates the spread of CRE even more than anticipated.仅通过临床培养来追踪耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)的传播,对CRE传播的低估程度甚至超过预期。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;40(6):731-734. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.61. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
医疗机构中多重耐药菌监测指标的建议:SHEA/HICPAC立场文件
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;29(10):901-13. doi: 10.1086/591741.
4
Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on the gowns and gloves of healthcare workers.医护人员工作服和手套上耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌及耐万古霉素肠球菌的检测
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;29(7):583-9. doi: 10.1086/588701.
5
2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.《2007年隔离预防指南:医疗机构中预防感染性因子的传播》
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.007.
6
Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings, 2006.医疗机构中多重耐药菌的管理,2006年
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S165-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.006.
7
Dissemination of the CDC's Hand Hygiene Guideline and impact on infection rates.美国疾病控制与预防中心手部卫生指南的传播及其对感染率的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10):666-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.10.006.
8
A controlled trial of universal gloving versus contact precautions for preventing the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms.一项关于通用戴手套与接触预防措施预防多重耐药菌传播的对照试验。
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10):650-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.02.011.
9
Impact of contact and droplet precautions on the incidence of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.接触和飞沫预防措施对医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染发生率的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;28(11):1261-6. doi: 10.1086/521658. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
10
Survey of isolation practices at a tertiary care pediatric hospital.三级护理儿童医院隔离措施调查。
Am J Infect Control. 2007 May;35(4):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.03.012.