Department of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Dec;92(12):6192-6. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-565.
Genetic selection goals for dairy cattle, originally aimed at production traits only, have been expanded in stages over the past 30 yr to include up to 12 target traits covering production, functionality, and health and fertility. Each addition to the selection goal often involves the use of additional measured phenotypic variates. The net effect of these additions is usually described as causing change in the relative emphasis on different traits, though there are varying definitions of what this means. This paper suggests that the current definitions of this term may be inappropriate and shows that, as usually used, it tends to overstate the net effect of the changes. A new definition of the relative emphasis of each target trait is proposed. It is defined as the percentage of total economic value of genetic gain in all traits attributable to gain in that particular trait. A useful parallel statistic measures the relative contribution of each phenotypic variate recorded. The result of applying these measures is contrasted with the use of current methods using United States Holstein data.
奶牛的遗传选择目标最初仅针对生产性状,但在过去 30 年中已逐步扩展,包括多达 12 个目标性状,涵盖生产性能、功能以及健康和繁殖力。选择目标的每次添加通常都涉及使用额外的测量表型变量。这些添加的净效应通常被描述为导致不同性状的相对重要性发生变化,尽管对于这意味着什么存在不同的定义。本文认为,该术语的当前定义可能不适当,并表明,通常使用的术语往往夸大了变化的净效应。本文提出了每个目标性状相对重要性的新定义。它被定义为所有性状遗传增益的总经济价值中归因于该特定性状增益的百分比。一个有用的类似统计数据衡量记录的每个表型变量的相对贡献。应用这些措施的结果与使用美国荷斯坦数据的当前方法进行了对比。