Suppr超能文献

不同谱带对辅音识别的相对重要性:对助听器频率转换的启示。

Relative importance of different spectral bands to consonant identification: relevance for frequency transposition in hearing aids.

机构信息

UCL Ear Institute, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2009;48(6):334-45. doi: 10.1080/14992020802644889.

Abstract

Listeners with high-frequency dead regions (DRs) benefit from amplification of frequencies up to 1.7 times the edge frequency, f(e), of the DR. Better consonant identification might be achieved by replacing the band from f(e) to 1.7f(e) with a higher spectral band. We aimed to identify the optimal band, using simulations with normal-hearing listeners. In experiment 1, nonsense syllables were lowpass filtered to simulate DRs with f(e) of 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 kHz. Identification was measured for each of these base bands alone and with a bandpass-filtered band added (but not transposed). The added band either extended from f(e) to 1.7f(e) or its center frequency was increased, keeping bandwidth fixed in ERB(N)-number. Performance improved with increasing center frequency and then reached an asymptote or declined. Experiment 2 used a mid-frequency base band, and a lower-frequency added band. The results also showed a beneficial effect of frequency separation of the added and base bands. Experiment 3 resembled experiment 1, but with bandwidth fixed in Hertz. For higher-frequency added bands, the benefit was lower than for experiment 1.

摘要

高频死区 (DR) 较大的听力损失患者,通过将 DR 的边缘频率 (f(e)) 放大 1.7 倍,可获得受益。通过用较高的频谱带替代从 f(e)到 1.7f(e)的频带,可能会获得更好的辅音识别。我们旨在通过正常听力者的模拟实验,来确定最佳频带。在实验 1 中,用低通滤波器对无意义音节进行滤波,以模拟 f(e)为 0.5、0.75 和 1.0 kHz 的 DR。对每个这些基础频带单独进行了识别测量,并添加了带通滤波频带(但未转换)。添加的频带要么从 f(e)扩展到 1.7f(e),要么其中心频率增加,在 ERB(N)-number 中保持带宽固定。随着中心频率的增加,性能得到改善,然后达到一个渐近线或下降。实验 2 使用中频基础频带和低频添加频带。结果还表明,添加和基础频带之间的频率分离具有有益的效果。实验 3 类似于实验 1,但在赫兹中固定带宽。对于较高频率的添加频带,收益低于实验 1。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验