Suppr超能文献

验证冠状窦激活模式在左心耳起搏中的应用,以进行实时评估二尖瓣峡部传导/阻滞。

Validation of coronary sinus activation pattern during left atrial appendage pacing for beat-to-beat assessment of mitral isthmus conduction/block.

机构信息

Oxford Cardiac Electrophysiology Group, John Radcliffe Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Apr;21(4):418-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01638.x. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mitral isthmus (MI) ablation for treatment of perimitral flutter is often performed during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation but is technically challenging. Traditional assessment of MI conduction by left atrial activation mapping while pacing from either side of the line is time-consuming, and cannot be performed during ongoing ablation. Analysis of the coronary sinus (CS) activation pattern during left atrial appendage (LAA) pacing has been proposed as a simpler technique for evaluating MI conduction, enabling beat-to-beat assessment of conduction during ablation procedures and prompt identification of conduction block.

METHODS

MI conduction was evaluated in 40 patients undergoing MI ablation using both: ((i) endocardial activation mapping and other standard techniques, and (ii) CS activation pattern during LAA pacing (change from distal-to-proximal activation to proximal-to-distal taken to signify the onset of MI block).

RESULTS

CS activation sequence was used to assess conduction in 39 of 40 patients (unable to advance CS catheter distally in one case). MI block was achieved in 36 of 39 cases. The mean MI conduction time (LAA to distal CS) was 92.9 +/- 25.9 ms prior to ablation and 178.4 +/- 59.9 ms after MI block was confirmed. The mean step-out in conduction time at point of block was 80.8 +/- 40.6 ms. In all individuals in whom CS activation indicated block, there was concordance with endocardial activation, differential pacing and, where detectable, presence of widely split double potentials. CS lesions were required to achieve block in 24 of 36 (67%) successful cases. Radiofrequency application time and procedure time to achieve MI block were 10.8 +/- 6.0 minutes and 21.1 +/- 15.3 minutes, respectively.

摘要

简介

在心房颤动(AF)消融期间,常对治疗二尖瓣峡部(MI)的二尖瓣峡部(MI)消融进行治疗,但技术上具有挑战性。通过在线两侧起搏时对左心房激活图进行传统评估,以评估 MI 传导既费时又不能在正在进行的消融过程中进行。已经提出了在左心房(LAA)起搏期间分析冠状窦(CS)激活模式的技术,作为评估 MI 传导的更简单技术,能够在消融过程中逐拍评估传导,并迅速确定传导阻滞。

方法

对 40 例接受 MI 消融术的患者分别采用:(i)心内膜激活图和其他标准技术,(ii)LAA 起搏期间 CS 激活模式(从远端到近端的激活转变为近端到远端的激活,表明 MI 阻滞的发生)评估 MI 传导。

结果

在 40 例患者中的 39 例(在一例中无法将 CS 导管推进远端)中使用 CS 激活序列评估了传导。在 36 例中实现了 MI 阻滞。消融前 MI 传导时间(LAA 到远端 CS)平均为 92.9 +/- 25.9 ms,MI 阻滞确认后为 178.4 +/- 59.9 ms。阻滞部位传导时间的平均跨步为 80.8 +/- 40.6 ms。在 CS 激活表明阻滞的所有个体中,与心内膜激活,差异起搏以及在可检测到的情况下存在广泛分裂的双电位一致。在 24 例(67%)成功病例中需要 CS 病变才能实现阻滞。实现 MI 阻滞的射频应用时间和程序时间分别为 10.8 +/- 6.0 分钟和 21.1 +/- 15.3 分钟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验