Loras College, Division of Physical Education and Sports Studies, 1450 Alta Vista St., Dubuque, IA 52001, USA.
J Biomech. 2010 Mar 3;43(4):771-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.034.
Numerous techniques have been employed to monitor humeral head translation due to its involvement with several shoulder pathologies. However, most of the techniques were not validated. The objective of this study is to compare the accuracy of manual digitization and contour registration in measuring superior translation of the humeral head. Eight pairs of cadaver scapulae and humerii bones were harvested for this study. Each scapula and humerus was secured in a customized jig that allowed for control of humeral head translations and a vise that permitted rotations of the scapula about three axes. Fluoroscopy was used to take images of the shoulder bones. Scapular orientation was manipulated in different positions while the humerus was at 90 degrees of humeral elevation in the scapular plane. Humeral head translation was measured using the two methods and was compared to the known translation. Additionally, accuracy of the contour registration method to measure 2-D scapular rotations was assessed. The range for the root mean square (RMS) error for manual digitization method was 0.27 mm-0.43 mm and the contour registration method had a RMS error ranging from 0.18 mm-0.40 mm. In addition, the RMS error for the scapular angle rotation using the contour registration method was 2.4 degrees . Both methods showed acceptable errors. However, on average, the contour registration method showed lesser measurement error compared to the manual digitization method. In addition, the contour registration method was able to show good accuracy in measuring rotation that is useful in 2-D image analysis.
由于肱骨头的翻译与几种肩部病变有关,因此已经采用了许多技术来监测肱骨头的翻译。然而,大多数技术都没有得到验证。本研究的目的是比较手动数字化和轮廓配准在测量肱骨头上移的准确性。本研究共采集了 8 对尸体肩胛骨和肱骨。每个肩胛骨和肱骨都固定在一个定制的夹具中,该夹具允许控制肱骨头的平移,以及一个虎钳,允许肩胛骨绕三个轴旋转。使用透视术拍摄肩部骨骼的图像。在肩胛骨平面中,当肱骨处于 90 度肱骨抬高时,操纵肩胛骨的位置处于不同位置。使用两种方法测量肱骨头的平移,并将其与已知的平移进行比较。此外,还评估了轮廓配准方法测量二维肩胛骨旋转的准确性。手动数字化方法的均方根(RMS)误差范围为 0.27 毫米-0.43 毫米,而轮廓配准方法的 RMS 误差范围为 0.18 毫米-0.40 毫米。此外,使用轮廓配准方法的肩胛骨角度旋转的 RMS 误差为 2.4 度。两种方法均显示出可接受的误差。然而,平均而言,与手动数字化方法相比,轮廓配准方法显示出较小的测量误差。此外,轮廓配准方法在测量有用的二维图像分析中的旋转方面具有良好的准确性。