Song Hai-jing, Liu Jing-tao, Gao Su-qin, Mo Yan-ping, Liu Fang, Ma Peng-lin
The Critical Care Medicine Department of the 309th Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100091, China.
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2009 Nov;21(11):660-3.
To investigate the compliance of ventilator bundle implementation and its preventive effect on ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP).
A before and after design was used in this single center study. Patients aged from 18 to 80 years, with mechanical ventilation (MV) duration over 48 hours were recruited during 1 year before (control group) and 2 years after bundle implementation (intervention group). Measurements included the rate of successful ventilator bundle implementation in intervention group, incidence of VAP, duration of MV and mortality within 28 days in both groups.
A total number of 237 patients, including 71 patients in control arm and 166 patients in intervention arm, were recruited in this study. There was no statistical significance in ratio of sex, mean age, category of diseases or mean acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score between two groups (all P>0.05). Significant changes were not found in MV duration [(5.9+/-5.6) days vs. (5.2+/-6.1) days], incidence of VAP (21.1% vs. 20.5%) and mortality within 28 days (16.9% vs. 19.8%) between control and intervention group as well. In intervention group, 57 of 166 (34.3%) patients were successfully implemented all of four ventilator bundle items. The successful rate of ventilator bundle implementation were 62.5% (35/56), 22.1% (21/95) and 6.7% (1/15) in patients received MV duration < or =3 days, 4-7 days and >7 days respectively. Among the four items of the bundle, head of bed elevation > or =30 degree angle had the lowest successful rate [43.4% (72/166)]. But it was much better in the implementation of daily wake-up plus weaning, prevention of peptic ulcer and prevention of deep vein thrombosis formation [92.2% (153/166), 88.0% (146/166) and 83.1% (138/166) respectively].
The poor compliance of ventilator bundle is an important factor in impacting the efficacy of ventilator bundle.
探讨呼吸机集束化治疗措施的依从性及其对呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的预防效果。
本单中心研究采用前后对照设计。选取年龄在18至80岁之间、机械通气(MV)时间超过48小时的患者,在集束化治疗措施实施前1年(对照组)和实施后2年(干预组)进行招募。测量指标包括干预组中呼吸机集束化治疗措施的成功实施率、VAP发生率、两组的MV时间以及28天内的死亡率。
本研究共纳入237例患者,其中对照组71例,干预组166例。两组在性别比例、平均年龄、疾病种类或平均急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)方面均无统计学意义(所有P>0.05)。对照组和干预组在MV时间[(5.9±5.6)天 vs.(5.2±6.1)天]、VAP发生率(21.1% vs. 20.5%)以及28天内死亡率(16.9% vs. 19.8%)方面也未发现显著变化。在干预组中,166例患者中有57例(34.3%)成功实施了所有四项呼吸机集束化治疗措施。接受MV时间≤3天、4至7天和>7天的患者,呼吸机集束化治疗措施的成功率分别为62.5%(35/56)、22.1%(21/95)和6.7%(1/15)。在集束化治疗措施的四项内容中,床头抬高≥30度的成功率最低[43.4%(72/166)]。但在每日唤醒加撤机、预防消化性溃疡和预防深静脉血栓形成方面的实施情况要好得多[分别为92.2%(153/166)、88.0%(146/166)和83.1%(138/166)]。
呼吸机集束化治疗措施依从性差是影响其疗效的重要因素。