Section of Social Systems Evolution, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan.
J Hum Evol. 2010 Feb;58(2):155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
The preferential use of one hand over the other is considered the primary behavioral expression of structural and functional asymmetry in cerebral structures, which is a decisive factor in human evolution. We present the first analysis of manual laterality in a form of object play-stone handling (SH) behavior-in a free-ranging group of Japanese macaques. Defined as a stone-directed manipulative activity, and comprised of multiple one-handed SH patterns (e.g., grabbing a stone in one hand and cradling it against its chest), as well as coordinated two-handed SH patterns with manual role differentiation (e.g., holding a stone with one hand and rubbing it with the other), SH behavior is a good candidate for the study of hand lateralization. We systematically followed the methodological framework developed by McGrew and Marchant (1997) to measure and analyze the presence, strength, and direction of manual preference in the performance of SH behavior and in various SH patterns, both at the individual and group level. Some individuals showed a significant manual lateral bias on a single SH pattern (hand preference), whereas others showed consistency in laterality across all or most of the SH patterns they performed (hand specialization). At the group level, we found that, although their collective distribution of left versus right remained random, most subjects were either significantly but incompletely lateralized, or completely lateralized within particular SH patterns (pattern specialization), but not across all SH patterns (no handedness for SH behavior as a whole). As predicted by the task-complexity model, hand specialization and handedness were stronger in the coordinated bimanual SH patterns than in the unimanual patterns. We discuss the implications of our findings for the evolution of manual preferences in noninstrumental object manipulation versus stone tool use in nonhuman primates and hominins.
惯用手的选择被认为是大脑结构的结构性和功能性不对称的主要行为表现,这是人类进化的决定性因素。我们首次分析了自由放养的日本猕猴群体中一种物体游戏——石器处理(SH)行为中的手的优势。定义为一种针对石头的操纵活动,由多种单手 SH 模式(例如,用一只手抓住石头并将其抱在胸前)以及具有手动角色分化的协调双手 SH 模式(例如,用一只手握住石头并用另一只手摩擦)组成,SH 行为是研究手优势的一个很好的候选者。我们系统地遵循了 McGrew 和 Marchant(1997)制定的方法框架,以衡量和分析在 SH 行为和各种 SH 模式中,个体和群体水平上手的优势的存在、强度和方向。有些个体在手的优势上表现出明显的单侧偏向(手偏好),而其他个体在手的偏向在他们执行的所有或大多数 SH 模式中表现出一致性(手专业化)。在群体水平上,我们发现,尽管它们的左右分布仍然是随机的,但大多数受试者要么明显但不完全偏向一侧,要么在特定的 SH 模式中完全偏向一侧(模式专业化),但不在所有 SH 模式中(整个 SH 行为没有手性)。正如任务复杂性模型所预测的那样,协调双手的 SH 模式中的手专业化和手性比单手模式更强。我们讨论了我们的发现对非工具性物体操纵中的手偏好进化与非人类灵长类动物和人类的石器使用的影响。