• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CT 结肠成像中息肉大小和体积的比较:对后续 CT 结肠成像的影响。

Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1561-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2618.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.2618
PMID:19933648
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of polyp measurements at CT colonography and the factors that affect the measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty colonoscopically proven cases of polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger were analyzed by two observers who measured each polyp in supine and prone views. Manual measurements of 2D volume by summation of areas, 2D maximum diameter, and 3D maximum diameter and automated measurements of 3D maximum diameter and volume were recorded for each observer and were repeated for one of the observers. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was calculated. Analysis was performed to determine the measurement parameter that correlated most with summation-of-areas volume. Supine and prone measurements as a surrogate for tracking change in polyp size over time were analyzed to determine the measurement parameter with the least variation.

RESULTS

Maximum diameter measured manually on 3D images had the highest correlation with summation-of-areas volume. Manual summation-of-areas volume was found to have the least variation between supine and prone measurements.

CONCLUSION

Linear polyp measurement in the 3D endoluminal view appears to be the most reliable parameter for use in the decision to excise a polyp according to current guidelines. In our study, manual calculation of volume with summation of areas was found to be the most reliable measurement parameter for observing polyp growth over serial examinations. High reliability of polyp measurements is essential for adequate assessment of change in polyp size over serial examinations because many patients with intermediate-size polyps are expected to choose surveillance.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 CT 结肠成像中息肉测量的可靠性以及影响测量的因素。

材料与方法

对 50 例经结肠镜证实的直径≥6mm 的息肉进行分析,由 2 名观察者分别在仰卧位和俯卧位观察每个息肉。记录每位观察者手动测量的 2D 面积总和、2D 最大直径、3D 最大直径和 3D 体积,以及 1 名观察者重复的自动测量 3D 最大直径和体积。计算观察者内和观察者间的一致性。分析确定与面积总和体积相关性最高的测量参数。分析仰卧位和俯卧位测量作为随时间追踪息肉大小变化的替代方法,以确定变化最小的测量参数。

结果

手动测量的 3D 图像最大直径与面积总和体积相关性最高。仰卧位和俯卧位测量的手动面积总和体积之间的变化最小。

结论

根据目前的指南,在 3D 腔内视图中线性测量息肉似乎是切除息肉的最可靠参数。在我们的研究中,发现手动计算面积总和的体积是观察系列检查中息肉生长的最可靠测量参数。息肉测量的高可靠性对于充分评估系列检查中息肉大小的变化至关重要,因为许多中等大小息肉的患者预计会选择监测。

相似文献

1
Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.CT 结肠成像中息肉大小和体积的比较:对后续 CT 结肠成像的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1561-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2618.
2
Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.息肉:CT结肠成像的线性和体积测量
Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):802-11. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2413051534.
3
Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.CT结肠成像与光学结肠镜检查的手动和自动息肉测量比较
Acad Radiol. 2008 Feb;15(2):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.006.
4
CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.CT结肠成像:与手工技术相比的结肠息肉自动测量——人体体外研究
Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):120-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2421052068. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
5
Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.CT结肠成像中线性息肉测量:二维与三维显示的体外和体内比较
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):872-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2363041534.
6
Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.CT结肠成像的息肉测量:多读者、多工作站比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan;188(1):122-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1535.
7
Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: 3D endoluminal measurement with optimized surface-rendering threshold value and automated measurement.CT结肠成像中的线性息肉测量:采用优化表面渲染阈值的三维腔内测量和自动测量
Radiology. 2008 Jan;246(1):157-67. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2453061930. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
8
Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement.使用CT结肠成像进行息肉测量:与结肠镜检查的一致性以及观察条件对观察者间和观察者内一致性的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1597-604. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0171.
9
Polyp volume versus linear size measurements at CT colonography: implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions.CT结肠成像中息肉体积与线性尺寸测量:对未切除结直肠病变的无创监测的意义
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1605-10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0760.
10
Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.息肉测量的可靠性、准确性及差异:光学结肠镜检查与使用猪结肠标本的CT结肠成像对比
Radiology. 2007 Jul;244(1):157-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2441060794. Epub 2007 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings.CT 结肠成像:电子清洗和 CT 窗宽设置对水下结直肠息肉大小的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Nov;28(11):4766-4774. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5416-0. Epub 2018 May 14.
2
Evolution of Screen-Detected Small (6-9 mm) Polyps After a 3-Year Surveillance Interval: Assessment of Growth With CT Colonography Compared With Histopathology.3年监测期后经筛查发现的小(6 - 9毫米)息肉的演变:与组织病理学相比,CT结肠成像对息肉生长的评估
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;110(12):1682-90. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.340. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
3
The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.
CT 结肠成像术的第二次 ESGAR 共识声明。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar;23(3):720-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x. Epub 2012 Sep 15.