Suppr超能文献

一项针对混合性别性侵犯预防项目的评估。

An evaluation of a mixed-gender sexual assault prevention program.

作者信息

Bradley April R, Yeater Elizabeth A, O'Donohue William

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Box 8380, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Prev. 2009 Nov;30(6):697-715. doi: 10.1007/s10935-009-0198-4.

Abstract

This study evaluated the short-term effectiveness of a mixed-gender sexual assault prevention program developed for college students. Program participants (n = 177) were compared to non-program participants (n = 132) prior to the program and during a 2-week follow-up period on measures of rape myths, victim empathy, perceived negative consequences and estimated likelihood of committing rape, sexual communication, sexual assault awareness, and risky dating behavior. The prevention program was effective at increasing men's victim empathy and decreasing their adherence to rape myths but ineffective at changing women's assault-related knowledge, participation in risky dating behaviors, and sexual communication strategies. Limitations of the study and directions for future research in sexual assault prevention are addressed. Editors' Strategic Implications: This study provides an important example of the limitations of a single session prevention programming approach (even if it is well designed and executed) in addressing a systemic and pervasive problem like sexual assault on college campuses.

摘要

本研究评估了为大学生制定的一项男女混合性侵犯预防计划的短期效果。在该计划实施前以及为期两周的随访期间,将计划参与者(n = 177)与非计划参与者(n = 132)在强奸谬见、受害者同理心、感知到的负面后果以及估计的强奸可能性、性交流、性侵犯意识和危险约会行为等指标上进行了比较。该预防计划在增强男性的受害者同理心和减少他们对强奸谬见的认同方面有效,但在改变女性与性侵犯相关的知识、参与危险约会行为以及性交流策略方面无效。文中讨论了该研究的局限性以及性侵犯预防未来研究的方向。编辑的战略启示:本研究提供了一个重要例子,说明单次预防计划方法(即使设计和执行良好)在解决大学校园性侵犯这样的系统性和普遍性问题时存在局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验