Siebels M, Staehler M, Hegele A, Varga Z, Oberneder R, Doehn C, Heinzer H
Urologie Pasing, München, Germany.
Aktuelle Urol. 2010 Mar;41(2):122-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224676. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
Until recently, the standard therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Germany consisted of interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-alfa (IFN) as single agents or in combination, with or without chemotherapy. Since 2005, new drugs (target drugs) in the therapy for mRCC are available. The aim of this study was to analyse the current therapy standard in Germany.
By representative telephone interviews (GFK-Nürnberg by order of DGFIT) the following colleagues were contacted A: urologists in private practice (n = 40), B: oncologists in private practice (n = 40), C: hospital urologists (n = 35) and D: hospital oncologists (n = 35). Screening criteria were 1) responsibility for therapy in mRCC; 2) therapy of at least 10 patients with mRCC per year.
Patients/year: A: n = 19, B: n = 17, C: n = 43, D: n = 21. 98% of patients with mRCC were treated: A: the most frequent therapy was sunitinib (43%, 42%, 33% as first-, second-, third-line), B: the most frequent therapy was sunitinib (45% as first-line, 37% as second-line), the most frequent third-line therapy was sorafenib (35%); C: the most frequent therapy were sorafenib and sunitinib (first-line 26% vs. 27%, second-line 46% vs. 42%), in third-line therapy additionally temsirolimus 24%; D: primary sorafenib and sunitinib (first-line 33% vs. 40%, second-line 46% vs. 42%), in third-line therapy additionally temsirolimus 23%. Immunotherapy (IL-2, IFN with or without chemotherapy) in mRCC plays in Germany for the second- and third-line therapy in A-D no major role (less than 10%). Otherwise, for first-line therapy immunotherapy has some relevance: A: 25%, B: 37%, C: 33%, D: 16%. The most important criteria for therapy decision making in A-D were: efficacy, toxicity, drug approval status.
Most patients with mRCC in Germany were seen by hospital urologists. Sunitinib (in first-line) and sorafenib (in second-line) are currently the most frequent prescribed drugs in mRCC. Temsirolimus is used mostly for third-line therapy (followed by sunitinib/sorafenib). Treatment of mRCC in Germany is increasingly being performed by oncologists.
直到最近,德国转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的标准治疗方案包括白细胞介素-2(IL-2)、干扰素-α(IFN)单药治疗或联合治疗,可联合或不联合化疗。自2005年以来,mRCC治疗中有了新药(靶向药物)。本研究的目的是分析德国目前的治疗标准。
通过代表性电话访谈(由DGFIT委托GFK-纽伦堡进行)联系了以下几类同事:A:私人执业泌尿科医生(n = 40),B:私人执业肿瘤内科医生(n = 40),C:医院泌尿科医生(n = 35),D:医院肿瘤内科医生(n = 35)。筛选标准为:1)负责mRCC治疗;2)每年至少治疗10例mRCC患者。
每年治疗的患者数量:A组n = 19,B组n = 17,C组n = 43,D组n = 21。98%的mRCC患者接受了治疗:A组:最常用的治疗药物是舒尼替尼(一线治疗占43%,二线治疗占42%,三线治疗占33%);B组:最常用的治疗药物是舒尼替尼(一线治疗占45%,二线治疗占37%),最常用的三线治疗药物是索拉非尼(占35%);C组:最常用的治疗药物是索拉非尼和舒尼替尼(一线治疗分别占26%和27%,二线治疗分别占46%和42%),三线治疗中替西罗莫司占24%;D组:一线治疗主要是索拉非尼和舒尼替尼(分别占33%和40%,二线治疗分别占46%和42%),三线治疗中替西罗莫司占23%。在德国,免疫治疗(IL-2、IFN联合或不联合化疗)在A - D组的二线和三线治疗中作用不大(不到10%)。否则,对于一线治疗,免疫治疗有一定相关性:A组为25%,B组为37%,C组为33%,D组为16%。A - D组治疗决策的最重要标准是:疗效、毒性、药物获批情况。
德国大多数mRCC患者由医院泌尿科医生诊治。舒尼替尼(一线治疗)和索拉非尼(二线治疗)目前是mRCC最常用的处方药。替西罗莫司主要用于三线治疗(其次是舒尼替尼/索拉非尼)。德国mRCC的治疗越来越多地由肿瘤内科医生进行。