Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Lung Cancer. 2010 Aug;69(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
Even if the prognostic role of SUVmax of 18-FDG-PET has been largely investigated, many issues regarding its relationship with pathologic staging and histological subtypes still remain controversial. This retrospective study investigated the prognostic significance of SUVmax in 119 completely resected, pathologically proven NSCLC. The SUVmax values resulted significantly related to histological subtypes (p<0.001), histological grading (p<0.001), and pathologic stage (p<0.001). The optimal cut-off value of SUVmax to predict prognosis in the whole series was 6.7 (p=0.029). 2-Year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 91% for SUVmax < or =6.7 and 55% for SUVmax >6.7 (p<0.001). SUVmax still remain a significant predictor of survival in Stage IB (2-year DSS of 100% for SUVmax < or =6.7; 51% for SUVmax >6.7, p=0.016). The optimal cut-off values of SUVmax to predict prognosis were 5 for adenocarcinoma (p=0.027) and 10.7 for other non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC subtypes (p=0.010). These histologic-specific cut-offs resulted significantly related to survival when stratified for stage: 2-year DSS for Stage IB adenocarcinoma were 100% for SUV< or =5 and 40% for SUVmax >5 (p=0.051); 2-year DSS for Stage IB non-adenocarcinoma were 83% for SUVmax < or =10.7 and 26% for SUVmax >10.7 (p=0.018). Adenocarcinomas showed significantly lower survival results respect to other NSCLC for intermediate SUVmax level (range 5.5-11.3) (p=0.021). High SUVmax resulted an independent negative prognostic factor at multivariate analysis (HR of 15.7, 95% CI of 2.50-98.44, p=0.003). In conclusion, SUVmax represents a significant prognostic factor in surgically resected NSCLC but a great variability between different histological subtypes, even when adjusted for stage, is present and could be considered when planning future trials on prognostic role of FDG uptake.
即使 18-FDG-PET 的 SUVmax 的预后作用已经得到了广泛的研究,但仍有许多关于其与病理分期和组织学亚型关系的问题存在争议。这项回顾性研究调查了 119 例完全切除、病理证实的 NSCLC 中 SUVmax 的预后意义。SUVmax 值与组织学亚型(p<0.001)、组织学分级(p<0.001)和病理分期(p<0.001)显著相关。整个系列中 SUVmax 预测预后的最佳截断值为 6.7(p=0.029)。2 年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)为 SUVmax<6.7 者为 91%,SUVmax>6.7 者为 55%(p<0.001)。SUVmax 仍然是 IB 期生存的显著预测因素(SUVmax<6.7 的 2 年 DSS 为 100%;SUVmax>6.7 的为 51%,p=0.016)。SUVmax 预测预后的最佳截断值分别为腺癌的 5(p=0.027)和其他非腺癌 NSCLC 亚型的 10.7(p=0.010)。当按分期分层时,这些组织学特异性的截断值与生存显著相关:IB 期腺癌的 SUVmax<5 的 2 年 DSS 为 100%,SUVmax>5 的为 40%(p=0.051);IB 期非腺癌的 SUVmax<10.7 的 2 年 DSS 为 83%,SUVmax>10.7 的为 26%(p=0.018)。腺癌在 SUVmax 中等水平(5.5-11.3)时与其他 NSCLC 相比,生存率显著降低(p=0.021)。在多变量分析中,高 SUVmax 是独立的预后不良因素(HR 为 15.7,95%CI 为 2.50-98.44,p=0.003)。总之,SUVmax 是 NSCLC 手术切除后的一个显著的预后因素,但不同组织学亚型之间存在很大的差异,即使在调整了分期之后也是如此,这在规划未来关于 FDG 摄取的预后作用的试验时需要考虑到。