Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素II 1型受体阻断:厚望重归现实?

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade: high hopes sent back to reality?

作者信息

Grothusen A, Divchev D, Luchtefeld M, Schieffer B

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical School of Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Dec;57(6):773-85.

Abstract

Chronic activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a crucial role in the development of various cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Thus, effective RAS inhibition has been a major achievement to improve the treatment of patients at risk for CVDs, such as myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke. Three substance classes that block RAS-activation are currently available, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade (ARB) and renin inhibitors. Although the overall goal of these drugs remains the blockade of RAS activation, their individual targets in this system vary and may substantially influence the clinical benefit derived from the long term use of these substances. Here, we summarize the evidence available for the use of ARBs in different cardiovascular pathologies and the impact of this evidence on current treatment guidelines for patients at risk for CVD. Today, ARBs represent a good alternative in case of ACE-inhibitor intolerance due to their outstanding tolerability. ARBs in comparison to ACE-inhibitors have been proven to exert similar effective in the treatment of systolic heart failure, primary prevention of stroke, new onset of diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 and DM type 2 dependent macroalbuminuria. ARBs should be considered as alternatives to ACE-inhibitors in subjects post-myocardial infarction. Overall however, there is no profound proof for a specific cardiovascular protection by blockade of the angiotensin II Type 1 (AT1) receptor that exceeds the impact of ACE-inhibition or synergises with ACE-blockade. In fact, combination of ARBs and ACE-inhibitor result in an increased rate of adverse effects and, therefore, this combination should not be encouraged. To summarize, the initial hope for a more specific impact on cardiovascular diseases by inhibition of the AT1-receptor in comparison to ACE-inhibition has not come true. However, ARBs have been proven to be equally effective as ACE-blockade in a large variety of clinical settings.

摘要

肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)的慢性激活在各种心血管疾病(CVD)的发展中起着关键作用。因此,有效的RAS抑制是改善对有CVD风险患者治疗的一项重大成就,这些患者包括心肌梗死、心力衰竭和中风患者。目前有三类物质可阻断RAS激活,即血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、血管紧张素II 1型受体阻滞剂(ARB)和肾素抑制剂。尽管这些药物的总体目标仍是阻断RAS激活,但它们在该系统中的各自靶点不同,可能会对长期使用这些物质所带来的临床益处产生重大影响。在此,我们总结了关于ARB在不同心血管病症中应用的现有证据,以及该证据对当前CVD风险患者治疗指南的影响。如今,由于ARB具有出色的耐受性,在ACE抑制剂不耐受的情况下,它是一个很好的替代选择。与ACE抑制剂相比,ARB已被证明在治疗收缩性心力衰竭、中风的一级预防、2型糖尿病(DM)的新发以及2型DM相关性大量蛋白尿方面具有相似的疗效。心肌梗死后的患者应将ARB视为ACE抑制剂的替代药物。然而总体而言,没有确凿证据表明阻断血管紧张素II 1型(AT1)受体能带来超过ACE抑制作用或与ACE阻断协同作用的特定心血管保护作用。事实上,ARB与ACE抑制剂联合使用会导致不良反应发生率增加,因此不应鼓励这种联合用药。总之,最初希望通过抑制AT1受体比ACE抑制对心血管疾病产生更特异性影响的愿望并未实现。然而,在多种临床情况下,ARB已被证明与ACE阻断同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验