Research Department, GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, Heiloo, the Netherlands.
Psychother Res. 2010 May;20(3):273-84. doi: 10.1080/10503300903376320.
Over the last few years, three-level longitudinal models have become more common in psychotherapy research, particularly in therapist-effect or group-effect studies. Thus far, limited attention has been paid to power analysis in these models. This article demonstrates the effects of intraclass correlation, level of randomization, sample size, covariates and drop-out on power, using data from a routine outcome monitoring study. Results indicate that randomization at the patient level is the most efficient, and that increasing the number of measurements does not increase power much. Adding a covariate or having a 25% drop-out rate had limited effects on study power in our data. In addition, the results demonstrate that sufficient power can be reached with small sample sizes, but that larger sample sizes are needed to prevent estimation bias for the model parameters and standard errors.
在过去的几年中,三水平纵向模型在心理治疗研究中变得越来越普遍,特别是在治疗师效应或组效应研究中。到目前为止,这些模型中的功效分析还没有得到足够的关注。本文使用常规结果监测研究的数据,演示了组内相关、随机化水平、样本量、协变量和脱落对功效的影响。结果表明,在患者水平上进行随机化是最有效的,并且增加测量次数对功效的提高不大。在我们的数据中,添加协变量或有 25%的脱落率对研究功效的影响有限。此外,结果表明,通过小样本量可以达到足够的功效,但需要更大的样本量来防止模型参数和标准误差的估计偏差。