Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400400, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400, USA.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1791-810. doi: 10.1037/a0016455.
Schutz and Lipscomb (2007) reported an audiovisual illusion in which the length of the gesture used to produce a sound altered the perception of that sound's duration. This contradicts the widely accepted claim that the auditory system generally dominates temporal tasks because of its superior temporal acuity. Here, in the first of 4 experiments, we show that impact gestures influence duration ratings of percussive but not sustained sounds. In the 2nd, we show that the illusion is present even if the percussive sound occurs up to 700 ms after the visible impact, but disappears if the percussive sound precedes the visible impact. In the 3rd experiment, we show that only the motion after the visible impact influences perceived tone duration. The 4th experiment (replacing the impact gestures with the written text long and short) suggests that the phenomenon is not due to response bias. Given that visual influence in this paradigm is dependent on the presence of an ecologically plausible audiovisual relationship, we conclude that cross-modal causality plays a key role in governing the integration of sensory information.
舒茨和利普斯科姆(2007)报告了一种视听错觉,即在产生声音时使用的手势的长度改变了对该声音持续时间的感知。这与广泛接受的观点相矛盾,即由于听觉系统具有较高的时间分辨率,因此听觉系统通常主导时间任务。在这 4 个实验中的第一个实验中,我们表明冲击手势会影响打击声但不会影响持续声的持续时间评分。在第二个实验中,我们表明,即使在可见的冲击后 700 毫秒才出现打击声,该错觉仍然存在,但如果打击声先于可见冲击,则该错觉会消失。在第三个实验中,我们表明只有可见冲击后的运动才会影响感知的音调持续时间。第四个实验(用长和短的书面文字代替冲击手势)表明,该现象不是由于响应偏差引起的。鉴于该范式中的视觉影响取决于存在生态上合理的视听关系,我们得出结论,跨模态因果关系在控制感觉信息的整合中起着关键作用。