Zuk J A, Kenyon W E, Myskow M W
Department of Histopathology, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool.
J Clin Pathol. 1991 Jan;44(1):10-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.1.10.
In the first six months of a formal Internal Quality Assessment Scheme operating in the Department of Histopathology, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool, 1005 items of data were gathered, relating to 80 cases. The scheme entails a random 2% sample of biopsy specimens being selected, each case being analysed using a structured proforma, and a numerical scoring system being allocated to all aspects of specimen handling. Technical and secretarial performance was good while the quality of clinical information provided by the requesting clinician was poor. There was a wide variation in reporting times, which related partly to the complexity of the specimen, and partly to the degree of supervision required by the reporting pathologist. Month by month analysis of reporting times showed a significant increase in reporting times associated with rotation of junior staff, but not with periods of annual leave. Pathologist performance scores were good, but close examination of components of the overall score for an individual pathologist indicated occasional areas of weakness (such as the adequacy of the macroscopic report). It is concluded that this scheme is worthwhile and its practice will be continued indefinitely. The comprehensive nature of the analysis allows for the formal identification of areas of work which need improvement, and the allocation of a formal numerical score allows improvement in these areas to be monitored. The monthly meetings provide a means whereby performance scores are fed back to the participating pathologists, and they are also of general educational value regarding histological reporting practice. It is intended that the scheme be extended to include the assessment of special stains, frozen sections, and adequacy of the report delivery service. The system is easily adaptable for use within other histopathology departments.
在利物浦布罗德格林医院组织病理学部门实施正式内部质量评估计划的头六个月里,收集了与80个病例相关的1005项数据。该计划要求随机抽取2%的活检标本进行样本分析,每个病例都要使用结构化表格进行分析,并为标本处理的各个方面分配一个数字评分系统。技术和秘书工作表现良好,但申请临床医生提供的临床信息质量较差。报告时间差异很大,部分原因与标本的复杂性有关,部分原因与报告病理学家所需的监督程度有关。逐月分析报告时间显示,与初级工作人员轮岗相关的报告时间显著增加,但与年假期间无关。病理学家的表现评分良好,但仔细检查个别病理学家的总体评分组成部分会发现偶尔存在薄弱环节(如大体报告的充分性)。结论是该计划是值得的,其实施将无限期持续下去。分析的全面性允许正式确定需要改进的工作领域,正式的数字评分允许对这些领域的改进进行监测。每月的会议提供了一种方式,通过这种方式可以将表现评分反馈给参与的病理学家,并且它们对于组织学报告实践也具有普遍的教育价值。计划将该计划扩展到包括特殊染色、冰冻切片和报告交付服务充分性的评估。该系统很容易适用于其他组织病理学部门。