Suppr超能文献

小儿创伤患者拔管后喘鸣的预测因素

Predictors of postextubation stridor in pediatric trauma patients.

作者信息

Kemper K J, Benson M S, Bishop M J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1991 Mar;19(3):352-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199103000-00012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine which factors are the best predictors of postextubation stridor in pediatric trauma patients.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

The Burn and Trauma ICUs at Harborview Medical Center from March to September 1989.

PATIENTS

Children were eligible for the study if they were less than 15 yr old, were intubated for greater than 12 hr, and did not have underlying cardiopulmonary disease. The study included 25 patients with 30 extubations. RISK FACTORS ASSESSED: Age, type of injury (burn vs. trauma), location of intubation ("field" vs. hospital), endotracheal tube size, length of intubation, and presence of an airleak around the tube at the time of extubation at 30 cm H2O pressure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Moderate to severe postextubation stridor requiring treatment with racemic epinephrine, helium-oxygen, reintubation, or tracheostomy.

RESULTS

Treatment for postextubation stridor was required after 11 (37%) of 30 extubations, with five reintubations and one tracheostomy. The best predictor of postextubation stridor was absence of an airleak at the time of extubation (sensitivity 100%, positive predictive value 79%, p less than .001), followed by type of injury (facial burn vs. all others; sensitivity 64%, positive predictive value 88%, p less than .001). After controlling for these two factors, no other factor studied was a significant predictor of postextubation stridor.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric trauma patients, mechanism of injury (facial burn vs. other) and absence of an airleak at the time of extubation are the strongest factors predicting postextubation stridor. Patients with one or both risk factors require special attention to airway management.

摘要

目的

确定哪些因素是小儿创伤患者拔管后喘鸣的最佳预测指标。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

1989年3月至9月在哈博维尤医疗中心的烧伤与创伤重症监护病房。

患者

年龄小于15岁、插管超过12小时且无潜在心肺疾病的儿童符合研究条件。该研究纳入了25例患者,共进行了30次拔管。评估的危险因素:年龄、损伤类型(烧伤与创伤)、插管地点(“现场”与医院)、气管导管尺寸、插管时间以及拔管时在30 cm H₂O压力下导管周围有无漏气。

主要观察指标

需要用消旋肾上腺素、氦氧混合气、重新插管或气管切开术治疗的中度至重度拔管后喘鸣。

结果

30次拔管中有11次(37%)需要对拔管后喘鸣进行治疗,其中5次重新插管,1次气管切开。拔管后喘鸣的最佳预测指标是拔管时无漏气(敏感性100%,阳性预测值79%,p<0.001),其次是损伤类型(面部烧伤与其他所有情况;敏感性64%,阳性预测值88%,p<0.001)。在控制这两个因素后,所研究的其他因素均不是拔管后喘鸣的显著预测指标。

结论

在小儿创伤患者中,损伤机制(面部烧伤与其他情况)和拔管时无漏气是预测拔管后喘鸣的最强因素。有一个或两个危险因素的患者需要特别关注气道管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验