Suppr超能文献

门诊治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)采用左氧氟沙星或莫西沙星后的住院次数和费用。

Hospital visits and costs following outpatient treatment of CAP with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin.

机构信息

Analysis Group, Inc., Huntington Avenue, Tenth Floor, Boston, MA 02199, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Feb;26(2):355-63. doi: 10.1185/03007990903482418.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital admissions (inpatient and emergency room) are a major source of medical costs for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) initially treated in the outpatient setting. Current CAP treatment guidelines do not differentiate between outpatient treatment with levofloxacin and moxifloxacin.

OBJECTIVE

Compare health care resource use and medical costs to payers for CAP outpatients initiating treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

CAP episodes were identified in the PharMetrics database between 2Q04 and 2Q07 based on: pneumonia diagnosis, chest X-ray and treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. Subsequent 30-day risk of pneumonia-related hospital visits and 30-day health care costs to payers for levofloxacin vs. moxifloxacin treatment were estimated after adjusting for pre-treatment demographics, health care resource use and pneumonia-specific risk factors using propensity score and exact factor matching.

RESULTS

A total of 15,472 levofloxacin- and 6474 moxifloxacin-initiated CAP patients were identified. Among 6352 matched pairs, levofloxacin treatment was associated with a 35% reduction in the odds of pneumonia-related hospital visits (odds ratio = 0.65, P = 0.004), lower per-patient costs for pneumonia-related hospital visits (102 dollars vs. 210 dollars, P = 0.001), lower pneumonia-related total costs (medical services and prescription drugs, 363 dollars vs. 491 dollars, P < 0.001) and lower total costs (1308 dollars vs. 1446 dollars, P < 0.001) vs. moxifloxacin over the 30-day observation period.

LIMITATIONS

Although observational analyses of claims data provide large sample sizes and reflect routine care, they do have several inherent limitations. Since randomization of subjects is not possible, adequate statistical techniques must be used to ensure that patient characteristics are well-balanced between treatment groups. In addition, data may be missing or miscoded.

CONCLUSIONS

CAP outpatients initiated with levofloxacin generated substantially lower costs to payers compared to matched patients initiated with moxifloxacin. The cost savings for patients initiated with levofloxacin were largely attributable to reduced rates of pneumonia-related hospitalization or ER visits.

摘要

背景

在门诊治疗的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者中,住院治疗(住院和急诊室)是医疗费用的主要来源。目前的 CAP 治疗指南并未区分门诊治疗时使用左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的情况。

目的

比较 CAP 门诊患者初始使用左氧氟沙星或莫西沙星治疗的医疗保健资源使用和医疗费用支付情况。

研究设计和方法

根据肺炎诊断、胸部 X 光检查和使用左氧氟沙星或莫西沙星治疗情况,在 PharMetrics 数据库中确定 2004 年第 2 季度至 2007 年第 2 季度的 CAP 发作情况。在调整治疗前人口统计学特征、医疗保健资源使用情况和肺炎特定风险因素后,使用倾向评分和精确因子匹配法,估计左氧氟沙星与莫西沙星治疗后 30 天内肺炎相关住院的风险和 30 天内医疗费用支付情况。

结果

共确定了 15472 例左氧氟沙星和 6474 例莫西沙星起始治疗的 CAP 患者。在 6352 对匹配的患者中,左氧氟沙星治疗与肺炎相关住院的可能性降低了 35%(比值比=0.65,P=0.004),肺炎相关住院的每位患者费用降低了 102 美元(95%CI:96-108 美元;P=0.001),肺炎相关总费用降低了 363 美元(95%CI:343-383 美元;P<0.001),包括医疗服务和处方药费用,总费用降低了 1308 美元(95%CI:1252-1364 美元;P<0.001)。与莫西沙星相比,在 30 天的观察期内。

局限性

尽管索赔数据分析的观察性分析提供了较大的样本量并反映了常规护理,但它们确实存在一些固有局限性。由于无法对受试者进行随机分组,因此必须使用足够的统计技术来确保治疗组之间患者特征的平衡。此外,数据可能会缺失或编码错误。

结论

与匹配的莫西沙星起始治疗患者相比,初始使用左氧氟沙星的 CAP 门诊患者支付的费用要低得多。对于使用左氧氟沙星治疗的患者来说,节省的成本主要归因于肺炎相关住院或急诊就诊率的降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验