Suppr超能文献

导管插入术前评估对ST段抬高型心肌梗死和应激性心肌病的诊断价值。

Assessment of the value of pre-catheterization in diagnosis of st-segment elevation myocardial infarction and tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy.

作者信息

Agladze R, Pagava Z, Mamatsashvili M, Sharashidze N, Jinjolia N

机构信息

Medical Centre Cito.

出版信息

Georgian Med News. 2009 Nov(176):35-8.

Abstract

The aim of our study was to assess if the analysis of precatheterisation initial 12-lead ECG could reliably differentiate between Taco-Tsubo Cardiomyopathy (TTC) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), two conditions with a similar clinical presentation. Of the 320 patients with suspected STEMI who underwent angiography over a 2-year period we identified 23 (7.2%) patients without significant coronary artery disease. 6 (26.1%) of whom met the diagnostic criteria for Tako-Tsubo Cardiomyopathy (6 females, median age 70 (65-83) years). TTC patients were compared with the remaining 297 patients with angiographic evidence of CAD. There was no significant difference in regard with heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, and corrected QT interval, but QT dispersion was less in TTC patients compared to STEMI group (34.1+/-9.7 vs. 43.9+/-16.2 p=0.046). Distribution of ST-segment elevation was similar in both groups, but the sum of the level of ST-segment elevation was significantly smaller (0,6+/-0.14 [0,4-0,8] mV vs. 0.95+/-0.17 [0,8-1,4] mV; p =0.002 ) and concurrent ST-segment depression was rare finding in TTC patients (16.6% vs. 65.7 % p=0.022). Careful analysis of initial ECG in combination with complex analysis of initial cardiac markers and presence of preceding stressful event could be informative tool in differentiating of TTC from STEMI.

摘要

我们研究的目的是评估导管插入术前最初的12导联心电图分析能否可靠地区分应激性心肌病(TTC)和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),这两种疾病临床表现相似。在两年内接受血管造影的320例疑似STEMI患者中,我们确定了23例(7.2%)无明显冠状动脉疾病的患者。其中6例(26.1%)符合应激性心肌病的诊断标准(6名女性,中位年龄70(65 - 83)岁)。将TTC患者与其余297例有冠状动脉造影证据的CAD患者进行比较。在心率、PR间期、QRS时限和校正QT间期方面无显著差异,但与STEMI组相比,TTC患者的QT离散度较小(34.1±9.7 vs. 43.9±16.2,p = 0.046)。两组ST段抬高的分布相似,但ST段抬高水平的总和显著较小(0.6±0.14 [0.4 - 0.8] mV vs. 0.95±0.17 [0.8 - 1.4] mV;p = 0.002),并且TTC患者中并发ST段压低的情况较少见(16.6% vs. 65.7%,p = 0.022)。结合对初始心脏标志物的综合分析以及先前应激事件的存在,仔细分析初始心电图可能是区分TTC和STEMI的有用工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验