Centre for Physical Activity and Health, University of Sydney, Australia.
J Phys Act Health. 2009;6 Suppl 1:S81-8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.s1.s81.
Walking is the most prevalent form of leisure time physical activity (LTPA). Advances in measurement of walking depend on understanding sources of error in self report. We examined the effect of prompting "walking for exercise, recreation, and sport" (WERS) upon surveillance estimates of LTPA and assessed what types of walking were recalled when reporting LTPA generally and when WERS was prompted specifically.
Data were collected by telephone survey from a random sample of 3,415 Australian adults (> or = 15 yrs). Respondents were asked first to recall any type of LTPA they participated in (unprompted) and if walking was not mentioned, WERS was prompted. All walkers were asked to describe the type of walking they did. Open-ended responses were categorized according to physical activity measurement dimensions.
Forty three percent did not report WERS unless prompted to do so. The prevalence of meeting recommendations by all LTPA was reduced by 10% for both genders and across all age groups if not prompted to recall WERS. The interpretation of WERS was broad and included travel related walking and dog walking whether unprompted or prompted.
Current challenges in walking surveillance include ensuring that both researchers and respondents understand WERS in a standardized manner.
散步是最普遍的休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)形式。步行测量技术的进步取决于对自我报告中误差源的理解。我们研究了提示“散步用于锻炼、娱乐和运动”(WERS)对 LTPA 监测估计值的影响,并评估了当一般报告 LTPA 以及当具体提示 WERS 时,回忆起哪些类型的散步。
通过电话调查,从澳大利亚 3415 名成年人(≥15 岁)的随机样本中收集数据。受访者首先被要求回忆他们参与过的任何类型的 LTPA(无提示),如果没有提到散步,则提示 WERS。所有散步者都被要求描述他们所做的散步类型。开放式回答根据体力活动测量维度进行分类。
除非提示,否则 43%的人不会报告 WERS。如果不提示回忆 WERS,所有性别和所有年龄组的满足建议的 LTPA 患病率都会降低 10%。对 WERS 的解释很广泛,包括与旅行相关的散步和遛狗,无论是无提示还是提示。
目前在散步监测方面面临的挑战包括确保研究人员和受访者以标准化的方式理解 WERS。