Graham David, Parkinson Benjamin, Evans Meghan, Keijzers Gerben, Derrington Petra
Department of Orthopaedics, Gold Coast Hospital, 108 Nerang Street, Southport, QLD 4217, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Dec;79(12):909-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05131.x.
We performed a prospective study of sneezes from orthopaedic registrars to assess the potential for intra-operative contamination from a masked surgeon, and to determine if head position can alter the potential for contamination.
Prospective controlled trial.
Four orthopaedic registrars from the Gold Coast Hospital each inhaled pepper to precipitate a sneeze. Cultures were taken with and without standard Smith & Nephew surgical masks, in positions directly in front and to the sides of a masked registrar. The process was repeated three times for each registrar. A control plate was left exposed to the atmosphere. A control plate and sneeze plate was cultured on blood agar. Three masks were subsequently swabbed to exclude contamination from the masks.
2/24 (8.33%) of the side with mask cultures returned significant bacterial growths. Also, 1/12 (8.33%) of the front with mask cultures returned significant growths. In addition, 9/12 (75%) of the direct sneezes resulted in significant bacterial counts. The control plate failed to return any growth. Subsequent culture of the exterior of three surgical masks failed to yield significant growth. There was a statistically significant odds ratio of 0.03 comparing the front and side group with the unmasked direct group. There was no statistically significant difference comparing front and side sneeze growth.
While the use of surgical face masks significantly reduces bacterial counts following a sneeze, it fails to eliminate the potential for surgical field contamination completely. The fact that significant bacterial counts can be returned from direct culture through a mask and to the sides of a mask suggests that head position is irrelevant and contamination is possible in any direction. It is, therefore, suggested that, if possible, a sneezing surgeon distances himself/herself as much as possible from the sterile field. We also recommend following a sneeze; surgeons should re-gown and glove, given the risk of contamination of the sterile field.
Level II.
我们对骨科住院医师打喷嚏的情况进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估戴口罩的外科医生在手术过程中造成污染的可能性,并确定头部位置是否会改变污染的可能性。
前瞻性对照试验。
来自黄金海岸医院的四名骨科住院医师每人吸入胡椒粉以引发打喷嚏。在有和没有标准施乐辉外科口罩的情况下,在戴口罩住院医师的正前方和侧面位置进行培养。每位住院医师重复该过程三次。留一个对照培养皿暴露于空气中。将一个对照培养皿和打喷嚏后的培养皿在血琼脂上培养。随后对三个口罩进行擦拭以排除口罩污染。
戴口罩培养的侧面样本中有2/24(8.33%)出现显著细菌生长。此外,戴口罩培养的正面样本中有1/12(8.33%)出现显著生长。另外,直接打喷嚏样本中有9/12(75%)细菌计数显著。对照培养皿未出现任何生长。随后对三个外科口罩外部的培养未产生显著生长。将正面和侧面组与未戴口罩直接打喷嚏组进行比较,优势比为0.03,具有统计学意义。正面和侧面打喷嚏后的生长情况比较无统计学显著差异。
虽然使用外科口罩可显著减少打喷嚏后的细菌数量,但未能完全消除手术区域污染的可能性。通过口罩直接培养以及在口罩侧面能得到显著细菌计数这一事实表明,头部位置无关紧要,任何方向都可能发生污染。因此,建议如果可能的话,打喷嚏的外科医生应尽可能远离无菌区域。我们还建议打喷嚏后,鉴于无菌区域有被污染的风险,外科医生应重新更换手术衣和手套。
二级。