Suppr超能文献

名字里有什么玄机?或者说,石头和兔子有什么不同。

What's in the name? Or how rocks and stones are different from bunnies and rabbits.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Mar;105(3):198-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

Abstract

Labels have been shown to play an important role in inductive generalization; however, the mechanism by which labels contribute to generalization early in development remains unclear. We investigated two factors that may influence the inductive potential of labels: semantic similarity and co-occurrence probability. Results suggested that adults and 6-year-olds rely on semantic similarity of labels and that their generalizations are not affected by co-occurrence probability. Specifically, generalization patterns were qualitatively similar for co-occurring semantically similar labels (e.g., bunny-rabbit) and non-co-occurring semantically similar labels (e.g., rock-stone) in 6-year-olds and adults. Unlike 6-year-olds and adults, 4-year-olds were likely to generalize co-occurring labels but not non-co-occurring labels. Possible mechanisms by which co-occurrence probability may influence label generalization in young children are discussed.

摘要

标签在归纳推广中起着重要的作用;然而,标签在发展早期对推广的贡献机制尚不清楚。我们研究了可能影响标签归纳潜力的两个因素:语义相似性和共现概率。结果表明,成年人和 6 岁儿童依赖标签的语义相似性,并且他们的推广不受共现概率的影响。具体来说,6 岁儿童和成年人的共同出现语义相似标签(例如,兔子-兔子)和非共同出现语义相似标签(例如,岩石-石头)的推广模式在质上是相似的。与 6 岁儿童和成年人不同,4 岁儿童更有可能推广共同出现的标签,而不是非共同出现的标签。讨论了共现概率如何影响幼儿标签推广的可能机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验