Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Talanta. 2010 Jan 15;80(3):1110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.08.035.
The detection and quantitation of four ethanolamines, tris(2-hydroxyethyl)amine (triethanolamine, TEA), N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)methylamine (methyldiethanolamine, MDEA), N-(2-aminoethyl)ethanolamine (AEA), and N,N-diethylethanolamine (DEA), were achieved in wastewaters from two aerobic activated sludge bioreactors located in an industrial wastewater treatment plant. The streams had salt concentrations of approximately 3% and 7% by weight in Reactor 1 and Reactor 2, respectively. The use of liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry avoided the need for some sample preparation steps such as extraction, concentration, and derivatization. Ion suppression in the electrospray, attributable to the presence of sodium clusters, was attenuated by a 10-fold dilution of the wastewaters with acetonitrile. A matrix-matched calibration model averted other potential interferences. For the compounds analyzed in selected reaction monitoring mode (TEA, MDEA, and DEA), the calibration curves presented linearity in a range of 10-1000microg/L with corresponding detection limits ranging from 2 to 11microg/L, depending upon the specific analyte and aqueous matrix. AEA was calibrated in selected ion monitoring mode (100-1000microg/L), with corresponding detection limits in the two wastewaters of 74.6 and 85.3microg/L, respectively. Overall good precision (<10%) and accuracy (97-110%) were achieved for both matrices, which fell within-laboratory reproducibility. Finally, the amines were introduced into six mixed liquor samples from both reactors and quantified following the reported protocol. Again, recoveries were close to 100% with a relative standard deviation of less than 10% in all cases.
在一家工业废水处理厂的两个好氧活性污泥生物反应器的废水中,检测并定量了四种乙醇胺,即三(2-羟乙基)胺(三乙醇胺,TEA)、N,N-双(2-羟乙基)甲胺(甲基二乙醇胺,MDEA)、N-(2-氨基乙基)乙醇胺(AEA)和 N,N-二乙基乙醇胺(DEA)。在反应器 1 和反应器 2 中,废水的盐浓度分别约为重量的 3%和 7%。使用液相色谱-电喷雾电离串联质谱法避免了一些样品前处理步骤,如提取、浓缩和衍生化。由于存在钠离子簇,电喷雾中的离子抑制作用通过将废水用乙腈稀释 10 倍得到减弱。基质匹配的校准模型避免了其他潜在干扰。在所分析的化合物中,采用选择反应监测模式(TEA、MDEA 和 DEA)时,校准曲线在 10-1000μg/L 的范围内呈线性,相应的检测限范围为 2-11μg/L,具体取决于特定的分析物和水基质。AEA 采用选择离子监测模式(100-1000μg/L)进行校准,在这两种废水中的检测限分别为 74.6 和 85.3μg/L。对于两种基质,均实现了良好的精密度(<10%)和准确性(97-110%),均在实验室重现性范围内。最后,根据报道的方案将这些胺引入两个反应器的六个混合液样品中进行定量。在所有情况下,回收率均接近 100%,相对标准偏差均小于 10%。