• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量元注意聚光灯的空间分布。

Measuring the spatial distribution of the metaattentional spotlight.

机构信息

National Institute of Advanced Industrial, Science and Technology, Central 6, Higashi, Tsukuba, Japan.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):107-24. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.004
PMID:20006524
Abstract

Studies in cognitive psychology have shown that the deployment of visual attention operates under spatial limitations, rendering its assignment to multiple locations difficult or costly. This study explored whether this conventional understanding applies to human metaattention as well. I measured the spatial distribution of metaattention during viewing of natural scenes and found that participants believed they could attend to multiple locations simultaneously. Study 2 tested whether this tendency could be modified by information about the tendency to overestimation. After participants were informed of this tendency toward overestimation with both verbal instruction and demonstrations of attentional blindness and blindness to these phenomena, the selectivity of metaattention increased. Study 3 demonstrated that participants overestimated their attentional abilities by comparing the metaattentional drawings and the actual behavioral performances of the same participants. These results were consistent with recent findings of metaattentional overestimation in change detection and suggested human insensitivity in monitoring attentional limitations.

摘要

认知心理学研究表明,视觉注意力的分配受到空间限制,使得同时分配到多个位置变得困难或代价高昂。本研究探讨了这种传统的理解是否也适用于人类的元注意。我在观看自然场景时测量了元注意的空间分布,发现参与者认为他们可以同时关注多个位置。研究 2 测试了通过关于高估倾向的信息是否可以改变这种趋势。在参与者通过口头指导和对注意盲视和对这些现象的盲目性的演示了解到这种高估倾向之后,元注意的选择性增加了。研究 3 通过比较元注意的绘图和同一参与者的实际行为表现,证明了参与者高估了他们的注意力能力。这些结果与最近在变化检测中元注意高估的发现一致,并表明人类在监测注意力限制方面的不敏感性。

相似文献

1
Measuring the spatial distribution of the metaattentional spotlight.测量元注意聚光灯的空间分布。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):107-24. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
2
Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?大偏心度治疗 vigabatrin 后的参与者的视力障碍:是视觉、注意力还是识别缺陷?
Epilepsy Res. 2009 Dec;87(2-3):213-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
3
Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.任务难度与所关注位置的半球分布之间的相互作用:对注意力分散辩论的启示。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.004.
4
Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.将空间注意力持续分配到一个半视野内的多个位置。
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Feb 27;414(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
5
Attentional prioritizations based on spatial probabilities can be maintained on multiple moving objects.基于空间概率的注意力优先级可以在多个移动物体上得以维持。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):926-38. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.926.
6
Visual rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age.视觉向右的空间偏倚随年龄变化而变化。
Laterality. 2013;18(1):44-67. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2011.628675. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
7
Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time.客体表征在空间和时间上维持注意控制设置。
Cognition. 2009 Oct;113(1):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.016. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
8
Sustained division of the attentional spotlight.注意力焦点的持续分散。
Nature. 2003 Jul 17;424(6946):309-12. doi: 10.1038/nature01812.
9
Lateralisation of spatial processing and age.空间处理的偏侧化与年龄
Laterality. 2009 Jan;14(1):17-29. doi: 10.1080/13576500802022265.
10
Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.通过注视和箭头线索进行的视觉空间注意转移:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2008 Jun 18;1215:123-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.091. Epub 2008 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Metacognition of multitasking: How well do we predict the costs of divided attention?多任务处理的元认知:我们对注意力分散的代价预测得有多准确?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2014 Jun;20(2):158-165. doi: 10.1037/xap0000010. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
2
Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.寻求得分:在复杂动态自然场景中,目标对眼动和元注意分配的影响分离。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039060. Epub 2012 Jun 29.