• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窒息游戏:医生视角。

The choking game: physician perspectives.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):82-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1287. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2009-1287
PMID:20008424
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to assess awareness of the choking game among physicians who care for adolescents and to explore their opinions regarding its inclusion in anticipatory guidance.

METHODS

We surveyed 865 pediatricians and family practitioners. The survey was designed to assess physicians' awareness of the choking game and its warning signs, the suspected prevalence of patients' participation in the activity, and the willingness of physicians to include the choking game in adolescent anticipatory guidance. Information on the general use of anticipatory guidance also was collected.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 163 physicians (response rate: 21.8%). One-hundred eleven (68.1%) had heard of the choking game, 68 of them (61.3%) through sources in the popular media. General pediatricians were significantly more likely to report being aware of the choking game than were family practitioners or pediatric subspecialists (P = .004). Of physicians who were aware of the choking game, 75.7% identified >or=1 warning sign and 52.3% identified >or=3. Only 7.6% of physicians who were aware of the choking game reported that they cared for a patient they suspected was participating in the activity, and 2 (1.9%) reported that they include the choking game in anticipatory guidance for adolescents. However, 64.9% of all respondents agreed that the choking game should be included in anticipatory guidance.

CONCLUSIONS

Close to one third of physicians surveyed were unaware of the choking game, a potentially life-threatening activity practiced by adolescents. Despite acknowledging that the choking game should be included in adolescent anticipatory guidance, few physicians reported actually discussing it. To provide better care for their adolescent patients, pediatricians and family practitioners should be knowledgeable about risky behaviors encountered by their patients, including the choking game, and provide timely guidance about its dangers.

摘要

目的

评估关注青少年的医生对窒息游戏的认识,并探讨他们对将其纳入预期指导的看法。

方法

我们调查了 865 名儿科医生和家庭医生。该调查旨在评估医生对窒息游戏及其警告信号的认识、怀疑患者参与该活动的流行程度,以及医生是否愿意将窒息游戏纳入青少年预期指导。还收集了有关一般使用预期指导的信息。

结果

163 名医生(应答率:21.8%)完成了调查。111 名(68.1%)听说过窒息游戏,其中 68 名(61.3%)是通过大众媒体的来源听说的。普通儿科医生比家庭医生或儿科专家更有可能报告意识到窒息游戏(P =.004)。在意识到窒息游戏的医生中,75.7%识别出>或=1 个警告信号,52.3%识别出>或=3 个。只有 7.6%意识到窒息游戏的医生报告说他们照顾过一名他们怀疑正在参与该活动的患者,并且有 2 名(1.9%)报告说他们将窒息游戏纳入青少年预期指导。然而,64.9%的受访者都同意窒息游戏应该纳入预期指导。

结论

近三分之一接受调查的医生不知道窒息游戏,这是一种青少年可能危及生命的活动。尽管大多数医生承认窒息游戏应该纳入青少年预期指导,但很少有医生报告实际上在讨论这个问题。为了为他们的青少年患者提供更好的护理,儿科医生和家庭医生应该了解他们患者遇到的危险行为,包括窒息游戏,并及时提供有关其危险的指导。

相似文献

1
The choking game: physician perspectives.窒息游戏:医生视角。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):82-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1287. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
2
Poison prevention counseling: a comparison between family practitioners and pediatricians.预防中毒咨询:家庭医生与儿科医生的比较
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jan;154(1):65-70.
3
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
4
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
5
"Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders--Oregon, 2008.《八年级学生对“窒息游戏”的认知和参与情况——俄勒冈州,2008 年》。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Jan 15;59(1):1-5.
6
Association of adolescent choking game activity with selected risk behaviors.青少年窒息游戏活动与某些风险行为的关联。
Acad Pediatr. 2010 Nov-Dec;10(6):410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.09.006.
7
Primary care physician perspectives on reimbursement for childhood immunizations.基层医疗医生对儿童免疫接种报销的看法。
Pediatrics. 2008 Dec;122(6):1319-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2033.
8
Characteristics of general and subspecialty pediatricians who choose not to recertify.选择不再重新认证的普通儿科医生和儿科亚专科医生的特征。
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):711-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1956.
9
Shortchanging adolescents: room for improvement in preventive care by physicians.亏待青少年:医生在预防保健方面仍有改进空间。
Fam Med. 2001 Feb;33(2):120-3.
10
Health risks of Oregon eighth-grade participants in the "choking game": results from a population-based survey.俄勒冈州“窒息游戏”中八年级参与者的健康风险:基于人群的调查结果。
Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):846-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2482. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescent Experiences with Self-Asphyxial Behaviors and Problematic Drinking in Emerging Adulthood.青少年自我窒息行为经历与成年初期的问题饮酒
Glob Pediatr Health. 2021 Jul 31;8:2333794X211037985. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211037985. eCollection 2021.
2
Impact of Education on School-aged Children's Knowledge of and Participation in "The Choking Game".教育对学龄儿童关于“窒息游戏”的认知及参与情况的影响
Res Rev J Nurs Health Sci. 2016 Jun;2(2):18-25. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
3
Prevalence and associated harm of engagement in self-asphyxial behaviours ('choking game') in young people: a systematic review.
青少年自我窒息行为(“窒息游戏”)的患病率及其相关危害:一项系统综述
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Dec;100(12):1106-14. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308187. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
4
Prevention of the Choking Game: parent perspectives.防止窒息游戏:家长观点
J Inj Violence Res. 2012 Jul;4(2):73-8. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v4i2.119. Epub 2011 Apr 16.