Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):e146-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0810. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
As extremely preterm infant mortality rates have decreased, concerns regarding resource use have intensified. Accurate models for predicting time to hospital discharge could aid in resource planning, family counseling, and stimulate quality-improvement initiatives.
To develop, validate, and compare several models for predicting the time to hospital discharge for infants <27 weeks' estimated gestational age, on the basis of time-dependent covariates as well as the presence of 5 key risk factors as predictors.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of infants <27 weeks' estimated gestational age who were born between July 2002 and December 2005 and survived to discharge from a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network site. Time to discharge was modeled as continuous (postmenstrual age at discharge) and categorical (early and late discharge) variables. Three linear and logistic regression models with time-dependent covariate inclusion were developed (perinatal factors only, perinatal + early-neonatal factors, and perinatal + early-neonatal + later factors). Models for early and late discharge that used the cumulative presence of 5 key risk factors as predictors were also evaluated. Predictive capabilities were compared by using the coefficient of determination (R(2)) for the linear models and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve for the logistic models.
Data from 2254 infants were included. Prediction of postmenstrual age at discharge was poor. However, models that incorporated later clinical characteristics were more accurate in predicting early or late discharge (AUC: 0.76-0.83 [full models] vs 0.56-0.69 [perinatal factor models]). In simplified key-risk-factors models, the predicted probabilities for early and late discharge compared favorably with the observed rates. Furthermore, the AUC (0.75-0.77) was similar to those of the models that included the full factor set.
Prediction of early or late discharge is poor if only perinatal factors are considered, but it improves substantially with knowledge of later-occurring morbidities. Predictive models that use a few key risk factors are comparable to the full models and may offer a clinically applicable strategy.
随着极低出生体重儿死亡率的降低,人们对资源利用的关注日益加剧。准确预测患儿出院时间的模型有助于资源规划、家庭咨询,并激发质量改进措施。
基于时间相关协变量以及 5 个关键危险因素作为预测指标,建立并比较预测胎龄<27 周的患儿住院时间的模型。
我们对 2002 年 7 月至 2005 年 12 月在 Eunice Kennedy Shriver 国家儿童健康与人类发育研究所新生儿研究网络的一个机构存活至出院的胎龄<27 周的患儿进行了回顾性分析。将出院时间建模为连续(出院时的校正胎龄)和分类(早出院和晚出院)变量。建立了 3 个具有时间相关协变量纳入的线性和逻辑回归模型(仅围产期因素、围产期+早新生儿期因素以及围产期+早新生儿期+晚新生儿期因素)。还评估了使用 5 个关键危险因素的累积存在作为预测指标的早、晚出院模型。通过线性模型的决定系数(R(2))和逻辑模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)比较预测能力。
纳入了 2254 例患儿的数据。出院时校正胎龄的预测效果较差。然而,纳入后期临床特征的模型在预测早或晚出院时更准确(AUC:0.76-0.83[全模型]与 0.56-0.69[围产期因素模型])。在简化的关键危险因素模型中,早、晚出院的预测概率与观察到的概率相当。此外,AUC(0.75-0.77)与纳入全因素集的模型相似。
如果仅考虑围产期因素,预测早或晚出院的效果较差,但随着对后期发生的疾病的了解,效果会显著提高。使用少数关键危险因素的预测模型与全模型相当,可能提供一种临床适用的策略。