Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):608-13. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1579. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the degree to which ramipril and/or rosiglitazone changed beta-cell function over time among individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) who participated in the Diabetes Reduction Assessment With Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) Trial, which evaluated whether ramipril and/or rosiglitazone could prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The present analysis included subjects (n = 982) from DREAM trial centers in Canada who had oral glucose tolerance tests at baseline, after 2 years, and at the end of the study. beta-Cell function was assessed using the fasting proinsulin-to-C-peptide ratio (PI/C) and the insulinogenic index (defined as 30-0 min insulin/30-0 min glucose) divided by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (insulinogenic index [IGI]/insulin resistance [IR]). RESULTS Subjects receiving rosiglitazone had a significant increase in IGI/IR between baseline and end of study compared with the placebo group (25.59 vs. 1.94, P < 0.0001) and a significant decrease in PI/C (-0.010 vs. -0.006, P < 0.0001). In contrast, there were no significant changes in IGI/IR or PI/C in subjects receiving ramipril compared with placebo (11.71 vs. 18.15, P = 0.89, and -0.007 vs. -0.008, P = 0.64, respectively). The impact of rosiglitazone on IGI/IR and PI/C was similar within subgroups of isolated IGT and IFG + IGT (all P < 0.001). Effects were more modest in those with isolated IFG (IGI/IR: 8.95 vs. 2.13, P = 0.03; PI/C: -0.003 vs. -0.001, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with rosiglitazone, but not ramipril, resulted in significant improvements in measures of beta-cell function over time in pre-diabetic subjects. Although the long-term sustainability of these improvements cannot be determined from the present study, these findings demonstrate that the diabetes preventive effect of rosiglitazone was in part a consequence of improved beta-cell function.
本研究旨在确定在参加糖尿病预防评估中雷米普利和罗格列酮药物试验(DREAM)的空腹血糖受损(IFG)和/或葡萄糖耐量受损(IGT)个体中,雷米普利和/或罗格列酮随时间推移对β细胞功能的改变程度。该试验评估了雷米普利和/或罗格列酮是否可预防或延迟高危个体发生 2 型糖尿病。
本分析纳入了来自加拿大 DREAM 试验中心的受试者(n = 982),他们在基线、2 年后和研究结束时进行了口服葡萄糖耐量试验。采用空腹胰岛素原与 C 肽的比值(PI/C)和胰岛素原指数(定义为 30-0 分钟胰岛素/30-0 分钟血糖)除以稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(胰岛素原指数 [IGI]/胰岛素抵抗 [IR])评估β细胞功能。
与安慰剂组相比,接受罗格列酮治疗的受试者在基线和研究结束时的 IGI/IR 显著增加(25.59 比 1.94,P < 0.0001),PI/C 显著降低(-0.010 比-0.006,P < 0.0001)。相比之下,接受雷米普利治疗的受试者的 IGI/IR 或 PI/C 与安慰剂相比无显著变化(11.71 比 18.15,P = 0.89;-0.007 比-0.008,P = 0.64)。罗格列酮对 IGI/IR 和 PI/C 的影响在孤立性 IGT 和 IFG+IGT 的亚组中相似(均 P < 0.001)。在孤立性 IFG 中,作用更为温和(IGI/IR:8.95 比 2.13,P = 0.03;PI/C:-0.003 比-0.001,P = 0.07)。
在糖尿病前期受试者中,与雷米普利相比,罗格列酮治疗可使β细胞功能的衡量指标随时间推移而显著改善。尽管目前的研究无法确定这些改善的长期可持续性,但这些发现表明,罗格列酮的糖尿病预防作用部分是由于β细胞功能的改善。