Jenkins Sheryl D, Lindsey Pamela L
Mennonite College of Nursing, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA.
Clin Nurse Spec. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181c4abe9.
The purposes of this article were to provide background information about rapid response teams (RRTs), to describe the actual and potential outcomes of RRTs, to define the potential role of the clinical nurse specialist in leading RRTs, and to provide recommendations for implementation of RRTs. Rapid response teams provide the opportunity for early intervention for patients demonstrating clinical decline before they reach a point of no return. The long-standing practice of waiting for intensive intervention (code blue) until the patient experiences cardiopulmonary arrest has shown poor outcomes, bringing this practice into question. Although research results are mixed, there is evidence to suggest that the successful use of RRTs results in clinically significant patient outcomes as evidenced by decreased cardiopulmonary arrests and decreased rates in mortality. Other positive patient, nursing, and organizational outcomes can result from RRTs and are discussed. Clinical nurse specialists are uniquely qualified to provide leadership in the development and implementation of RRTs and the monitoring of outcomes. As RRTs become a more common standard practice, further research is needed to examine their benefits and to further refine effective early intervention for high-risk patients.
本文的目的是提供有关快速反应小组(RRTs)的背景信息,描述RRTs的实际和潜在结果,确定临床护理专家在领导RRTs方面的潜在作用,并为RRTs的实施提供建议。快速反应小组为那些在病情恶化到无法挽回之前就出现临床衰退的患者提供了早期干预的机会。长期以来,一直等到患者发生心肺骤停才进行强化干预(急救)的做法显示出不佳的结果,这一做法因此受到质疑。尽管研究结果不一,但有证据表明,成功使用RRTs会带来临床上显著的患者结局,如心肺骤停减少和死亡率降低。RRTs还可带来其他积极的患者、护理和组织方面的结果,本文对此进行了讨论。临床护理专家具备独特的资质,能够在RRTs的开发、实施以及结果监测方面发挥领导作用。随着RRTs成为一种更常见的标准做法,需要进一步开展研究,以检验其益处,并进一步完善针对高危患者的有效早期干预措施。