Zhang Weiguo, Ye Yingying, Chen Jinhua, Wang Yi, Chen Rong, Xiong Kunlin, Li Xue, Zhang Shaoxiang
Department of Radiology, Daping Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, No. 10, Chinajiang Branch Road, Daping, 400042, Chongqing, China.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2010 Jul;32(6):563-72. doi: 10.1007/s00276-009-0602-z. Epub 2009 Dec 12.
To explore the anatomic route of inferior petrosal sinus (IPS) after going out of the cranium and its confluence patterns with internal jugular vein (IJV), anterior condylar vein (ACV) and lateral condylar vein (LCV), and to supply knowledge about typing of IPS-IJV junction, so as to provide reference evidence for evaluation of transvenous access route in the diagnosis and treatment of skull base and cavernous sinus lesions.
In 120 patients, the IPS route and its confluence with IJV, ACV and LCV were shown by multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) and curve multi-planar reconstruction (CMPR). Combining with continuous thin slice, the IPS-IJV junction was further subdivided according to the level of IPS confluence with IJV and whether there is an anastomosis with sigmoid sinus (SS). Furthermore, the IPS length, venous diameter at IPS-IJV junction and IPS-SS communicating branch were determined and compared.
Inferior petrosal sinus directly draining into jugular bulb (JB) or/and draining into JB after communication with SS was found in 28 sides (11.7%, pattern A); IPS draining into IJV at the level of exterior opening of hypoglossal canal in 114 sides (47.5%, pattern B); IPS draining into IJV in a lower extracranial level in 83 sides (34.6%, pattern C); IPS with multiple junctions draining into IJV near the jugular foramen in 12 sides (5.0%, pattern D); IPS directly draining into VVP in 1 side (0.4%, pattern E); IPS being absent in 1 side (0.4%, pattern F). IPS draining into VVP via ACV was seen in 218 sides, IPS draining into VVP via LCV in 100 sides and IPS directly draining into IJV in 14 sides. After going out of the cranium, IPS goes along with IJV for a relatively long distance in some cases. The IPS extracranial length over 40 mm was found in ten sides and the lowest level of IPS route was at the inferior margin of the fourth cervical vertebra. The venous diameter at the IPS-IJV confluence was 0.8-5.7 mm (mean 2.51 mm) and it was significantly larger on the right side than on the left (P = 0.01). However, there was no remarkable difference between male patients and female ones.
Continuous thin-slice scanning by multislice spiral computed tomography in combination with MPR and CMPR can clearly show IPS route and its confluence with relevant veins, and determine the feasibility of procedures via IPS. Therefore, it can be used as an effective method for preoperative evaluation of IPS for diagnosis and treatment of skull base and cavernous sinus lesions by IJV access route.
探讨岩下窦(IPS)出颅后的解剖路径及其与颈内静脉(IJV)、髁前静脉(ACV)和髁外侧静脉(LCV)的汇合模式,了解IPS - IJV汇合处的分型,为评估经静脉入路诊断和治疗颅底及海绵窦病变的可行性提供参考依据。
对120例患者,采用多平面重建(MPR)和曲面多平面重建(CMPR)显示IPS路径及其与IJV、ACV和LCV的汇合情况。结合连续薄层扫描,根据IPS与IJV汇合的水平及是否与乙状窦(SS)有吻合,对IPS - IJV汇合处进一步细分。此外,测定并比较IPS长度、IPS - IJV汇合处静脉直径及IPS - SS交通支。
发现28侧(11.7%,A型)岩下窦直接注入颈静脉球(JB)或/和与SS交通后注入JB;114侧(47.5%,B型)岩下窦在舌下神经管外口水平注入IJV;83侧(34.6%,C型)岩下窦在较低的颅外水平注入IJV;12侧(5.0%,D型)岩下窦有多个汇合点在颈静脉孔附近注入IJV;1侧(0.4%,E型)岩下窦直接注入VVP;1侧(0.4%,F型)未发现岩下窦。218侧岩下窦经ACV注入VVP,100侧经LCV注入VVP,14侧直接注入IJV。岩下窦出颅后,部分病例与IJV伴行距离较长。发现10侧岩下窦颅外长度超过40 mm,岩下窦路径最低水平位于第4颈椎下缘。IPS - IJV汇合处静脉直径为0.8 - 5.7 mm(平均2.51 mm),右侧明显大于左侧(P = 0.01)。但男性患者与女性患者之间无显著差异。
多层螺旋CT连续薄层扫描结合MPR和CMPR能清晰显示岩下窦路径及其与相关静脉的汇合情况,确定经岩下窦手术的可行性。因此,可作为术前评估经颈内静脉入路诊断和治疗颅底及海绵窦病变时岩下窦情况的有效方法。