Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Feb;208(3):401-16. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1740-z. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
Muscarinic cholinergic M(1) and M(4) receptors may participate in schizophrenia's etiology and have been proposed as targets for antipsychotic medications.
Here, we investigated the involvement of these receptors in behavioral measures pertinent to schizophrenia using knockout mice lacking M(1) receptors (M(1)-/-), M(4) receptors (M(4)-/-), or both (M(1)-/-M(4)-/-).
We measured prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle without drugs and after treatment with scopolamine (0.32-1.8 mg/kg), xanomeline (3.2 mg/kg), oxotremorine (0.032-0.1 mg/kg), clozapine (1.0-5.6 mg/kg), or haloperidol (0.32-3.2 mg/kg).
In female (but not male) mice, combined deletion of both M(1) and M(4) receptors decreased PPI relative to wild-type mice, while knockout of either receptor alone had no significant effect. Scopolamine disrupted PPI in wild-type and M(4)-/- mice, but not in female M(1)-/-M(4)-/- or female M(1)-/- mice. When administered before scopolamine, xanomeline restored PPI in wild-type mice and M(1)-/- mice, but not in M(4)-/- mice. In contrast, pretreatment with oxotremorine increased PPI regardless of genotype. Effects of clozapine and haloperidol on PPI were not hindered by either mutation.
Deletion of both M(1) and M(4) receptors can disrupt PPI, suggesting that (at least partially redundant) M(1) and M(4) receptor-dependent functions are involved in sensorimotor gating mechanisms. PPI-disrupting effects of muscarinic antagonists appeared dependent upon M(1) receptor blockade. Our data also suggest that xanomeline exerts antipsychotic-like effects mainly through M(4) receptor stimulation, while stimulation of non-M(1)/M(4) subtypes may also have antipsychotic potential. Finally, our results do not support a role of M(1)/M(4) receptors in mediating antipsychotic-like effects of clozapine.
毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱 M(1)和 M(4)受体可能参与精神分裂症的病因,并被提议作为抗精神病药物的靶点。
在这里,我们使用缺乏 M(1)受体(M(1)-/-)、M(4)受体(M(4)-/-)或两者(M(1)-/-M(4)-/-)的敲除小鼠,研究了这些受体在与精神分裂症相关的行为测量中的参与情况。
我们在没有药物和用东莨菪碱(0.32-1.8mg/kg)、西那卡塞(3.2mg/kg)、氧托溴铵(0.032-0.1mg/kg)、氯氮平(1.0-5.6mg/kg)或氟哌啶醇(0.32-3.2mg/kg)处理后,测量了惊跳反射的前脉冲抑制(PPI)。
在雌性(而非雄性)小鼠中,与野生型小鼠相比,同时缺失两种 M(1)和 M(4)受体降低了 PPI,而单独缺失一种受体则没有显著影响。东莨菪碱破坏了野生型和 M(4)-/-小鼠的 PPI,但没有破坏雌性 M(1)-/-M(4)-/-或 M(1)-/-小鼠的 PPI。当在东莨菪碱之前给药时,西那卡塞恢复了野生型小鼠和 M(1)-/-小鼠的 PPI,但没有恢复 M(4)-/-小鼠的 PPI。相比之下,预先给予氧托溴铵无论基因型如何都增加了 PPI。氯氮平和氟哌啶醇对 PPI 的影响不受任何突变的阻碍。
同时缺失两种 M(1)和 M(4)受体可破坏 PPI,表明(至少部分冗余)M(1)和 M(4)受体依赖的功能参与了感觉门控机制。毒蕈碱拮抗剂的 PPI 破坏作用似乎取决于 M(1)受体阻断。我们的数据还表明,西那卡塞主要通过 M(4)受体刺激发挥抗精神病样作用,而刺激非 M(1)/M(4)亚型也可能具有抗精神病潜力。最后,我们的结果不支持 M(1)/M(4)受体在介导氯氮平的抗精神病样作用中的作用。