Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0330, USA.
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):585-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.019. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
In controlled trials medical expulsive therapy has improved outcomes in patients with ureteral stones but its real-world use and effectiveness outside a clinical trial have not been thoroughly examined. We studied the impact of targeted education of emergency department physicians about medical expulsive therapy and analyzed its impact on patient outcomes and cost.
In 2006 emergency department physicians at our institution were formally educated about medical expulsive therapy. Retrospective emergency department data were collected on patients with ureteral stones from 2003 and 2005 (before educational intervention), and 2007 (after intervention). Cost and 90-day post-emergency department event data were gathered from a health maintenance organization owned and operated by our medical center. Medical expulsive therapy prescribing trends, adverse outcome (repeat emergency department visit, hospital admission or surgery) and total cost related to ureteral calculus diagnosis were analyzed.
Of 166 health maintenance organization patients with ureteral calculi who met all study requirements 97 (58.4%) were prescribed medical expulsive therapy and 53 (31.9%) filled the medical expulsive therapy prescription, while 113 did not. Analysis revealed a 2-fold increase in medical expulsive therapy prescribing and a 4-fold increase in prescribing alpha-blockers in each time increment. Bivariate analysis showed that the frequency of adverse outcomes was lower in the medical expulsive therapy group (37.7% vs 53.1%) and medical expulsive therapy was associated with a lower mean total cost per patient ($1,805 vs $2,372).
Targeted educational intervention can increase the use of preferred medical expulsive therapy (alpha-blockers) in the emergency department. Medical expulsive therapy decreases the incidence of adverse events by 29% and decreases the total cost associated with ureteral stones by 24%.
在对照试验中,排石疗法改善了输尿管结石患者的预后,但在临床试验之外,其实际应用和效果尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在探讨对急诊科医生进行排石疗法针对性教育的效果,分析其对患者预后和成本的影响。
2006 年,我院急诊科医生接受了排石疗法的正规培训。回顾性收集我院急诊科 2003 年和 2005 年(教育干预前)以及 2007 年(教育干预后)输尿管结石患者的数据。数据来源于我们医疗中心所属的一家健康维护组织,涵盖了成本和急诊科后 90 天的事件数据。分析了排石疗法的处方趋势、不良结局(再次急诊科就诊、住院或手术)以及与输尿管结石诊断相关的总费用。
符合所有研究要求的 166 名健康维护组织输尿管结石患者中,97 例(58.4%)接受了排石疗法处方,53 例(31.9%)患者取药,113 例未取药。分析显示,排石疗法的处方率增加了 2 倍,α受体阻滞剂的处方率增加了 4 倍。单变量分析显示,排石疗法组的不良结局发生率较低(37.7%比 53.1%),且排石疗法与每位患者的平均总成本降低 24%相关(1805 美元比 2372 美元)。
针对性的教育干预可以增加急诊科对首选排石疗法(α受体阻滞剂)的应用。排石疗法可使不良事件的发生率降低 29%,与输尿管结石相关的总成本降低 24%。