Department Physiotherapy, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Mar;149(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.11.016. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic review of Combined Physical Therapy, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression and arm elevation for the treatment of lymphoedema secondary to an axillary dissection for breast cancer. Combined Physical Therapy starts with an intensive phase consisting of skin care, Manual Lymphatic Drainage, exercises and bandaging and continues with a maintenance phase consisting of skin care, exercises, wearing a compression sleeve and Manual Lymphatic Drainage if needed. We have searched the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro and Cochrane. Only (pseudo-) randomised controlled trials and non-randomised experimental trials investigating the effectiveness of Combined Physical Therapy and its different parts, of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression and of arm elevation were included. These physical treatments had to be applied to patients with arm lymphoedema which developed after axillary dissection for breast cancer. Ten randomised controlled trials, one pseudo-randomised controlled trial and four non-randomised experimental trials were found and analysed. Combined Physical Therapy can be considered as an effective treatment modality for lymphoedema. Bandaging the arm is effective, whether its effectiveness is investigated on a heterogeneous group consisting of patients with upper and lower limb lymphoedema from different causes. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of Manual Lymphatic Drainage. The effectiveness of skin care, exercises, wearing a compression sleeve and arm elevation is not investigated by a controlled trial. Intermittent Pneumatic Compression is effective, but once the treatment is interrupted, the lymphoedema volume increases. In conclusion, Combined Physical Therapy is an effective therapy for lymphoedema. However, the effectiveness of its different components remains uncertain. Furthermore, high-quality studies are warranted. The long-term effect of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression and the effect of elevation on lymphoedema are not yet proven.
本文旨在对联合物理疗法、间歇性气动压迫和手臂抬高治疗乳腺癌腋窝清扫术后淋巴水肿进行系统综述。联合物理疗法从强化阶段开始,包括皮肤护理、手动淋巴引流、运动和包扎,然后进入维持阶段,包括皮肤护理、运动、穿压缩袖套和必要时进行手动淋巴引流。我们检索了以下数据库:PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、PEDro 和 Cochrane。仅纳入了(伪)随机对照试验和非随机实验性试验,以调查联合物理疗法及其不同部分、间歇性气动压迫和手臂抬高的有效性。这些物理治疗必须应用于乳腺癌腋窝清扫术后出现手臂淋巴水肿的患者。共发现并分析了 10 项随机对照试验、1 项伪随机对照试验和 4 项非随机实验性试验。联合物理疗法可以被视为淋巴水肿的有效治疗方法。包扎手臂是有效的,无论其有效性是在由不同原因引起的上肢和下肢淋巴水肿患者组成的异质组中进行调查。手动淋巴引流的有效性尚未达成共识。皮肤护理、运动、穿压缩袖套和手臂抬高的有效性尚未通过对照试验进行调查。间歇性气动压迫是有效的,但一旦治疗中断,淋巴水肿体积就会增加。综上所述,联合物理疗法是淋巴水肿的有效治疗方法。然而,其不同组成部分的有效性仍不确定。此外,需要高质量的研究。间歇性气动压迫的长期效果和手臂抬高对淋巴水肿的影响尚未得到证实。