• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 PSA 检测前列腺癌的知情决策:风险指标传单评估。

Informed decision making on PSA testing for the detection of prostate cancer: an evaluation of a leaflet with risk indicator.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2010 Feb;46(3):669-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.022.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.022
PMID:20022239
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Population-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. To help men making informed decisions about prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening a risk indicator (www.uroweb.org) was developed. This risk indicator is embedded in a leaflet that informs men about the pros and cons of PCa screening and enables calculation of the individual risk of having a biopsy detectable PCa.

AIM

To assess the effect of providing a leaflet including individualized risk estimation on informed decision making of men, i.e. knowledge about PCa and PSA screening, attitude towards undergoing a PSA test and intention to have a PSA test.

METHODS

An intervention study among 2000 men, aged 55-65 years, randomly selected from the population registry of the city of Dordrecht, the Netherlands, in 2008. Men were sent a questionnaire on knowledge of PCa, attitude and intention to have a PSA test. Men without a history of (screening for) PCa were sent the leaflet and Questionnaire 2 within 2 weeks after returning Questionnaire 1. Validated health and anxiety measures were used.

RESULTS

One thousand and twenty seven of 2000 men completed Questionnaire 1 (51%), of whom 298 were excluded due to a history of (screening for) PCa. Of the 729 remaining men, 601 completed Questionnaire 2 as well. At the second assessment significantly more men met the requirements of informed decision making (15% versus 33%, p<0.001), more men had relevant knowledge (284/601, 50% versus 420/601, 77%, p<0.001) and the intention to have a PSA test had increased (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Providing information on PCa screening combined with individualized risk estimation enhanced informed decision making and may be used for shared decision making on PSA screening of physicians and patients.

摘要

背景

前列腺癌(PCa)的人群筛查仍然存在争议。为了帮助男性做出有关前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查的明智决策,开发了一个风险指标(www.uroweb.org)。该风险指标嵌入在一份传单中,告知男性 PCa 筛查的利弊,并能够计算出进行活检可检测到 PCa 的个体风险。

目的

评估提供包含个体风险估计的传单对男性知情决策的影响,即对 PCa 和 PSA 筛查的了解、对进行 PSA 测试的态度以及进行 PSA 测试的意愿。

方法

这是一项 2008 年在荷兰多德雷赫特市的人口登记处随机选择的 2000 名 55-65 岁男性的干预研究。男性收到了一份关于 PCa 知识、对进行 PSA 测试的态度和意愿的问卷。没有 PCa 病史(筛查)的男性在返回问卷 1 后两周内收到了传单和问卷 2。使用了经过验证的健康和焦虑测量方法。

结果

2000 名男性中有 1027 名完成了问卷 1(51%),其中 298 名由于有(筛查)PCa 病史而被排除在外。在剩下的 729 名男性中,有 601 名完成了问卷 2。在第二次评估中,更多的男性符合知情决策的要求(15%对 33%,p<0.001),更多的男性具有相关知识(284/601,50%对 420/601,77%,p<0.001),并且进行 PSA 测试的意愿增加(p<0.001)。

结论

提供关于 PCa 筛查的信息并结合个体风险估计可增强知情决策,并可用于医生和患者对 PSA 筛查的共同决策。

相似文献

1
Informed decision making on PSA testing for the detection of prostate cancer: an evaluation of a leaflet with risk indicator.基于 PSA 检测前列腺癌的知情决策:风险指标传单评估。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Feb;46(3):669-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.022.
2
Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: are patients making informed decisions?使用前列腺特异性抗原检测筛查前列腺癌:患者是否在做出明智的决策?
J Fam Pract. 1999 Sep;48(9):682-8.
3
Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested.前列腺癌的知情决策与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测:一项随机对照试验,探讨简短患者决策辅助工具对男性关于检测的知识、态度及意愿的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):367-79. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
4
Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study).前列腺癌筛查决策:全国医疗决策调查(DECISIONS研究)结果
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28;169(17):1611-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.262.
5
The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening.知情同意对患者进行前列腺特异性抗原筛查意愿的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jun 24;156(12):1333-6.
6
Intention to test for prostate cancer.前列腺癌检测意向
Eur J Cancer. 2005 May;41(7):990-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.01.011.
7
The relationship between prostate cancer knowledge and beliefs and intentions to attend PSA screening among at-risk men.高危男性中前列腺癌知识、信念与参加前列腺特异性抗原筛查意愿之间的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.013. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
8
A community-based randomised controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening.一项针对男性前列腺癌筛查的三种不同教育资源的社区随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 May;57(2):168-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.011.
9
A community-based intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among Hispanic American men changed knowledge and role preferences: a cluster RCT.一项基于社区的干预措施,旨在促进西班牙裔美国男性对前列腺癌筛查的知情决策:一项群组 RCT 研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):e44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.033. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
10
Promoting prostate-specific antigen informed decision-making. Evaluating two community-level interventions.促进前列腺特异性抗原知情决策。评估两种社区层面的干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Detection of Common Skin Diseases, Including Leprosy: Development and Validation of an Awareness Questionnaire.常见皮肤病(包括麻风病)的早期检测:一份认知调查问卷的编制与验证
Int J Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;70:1607938. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1607938. eCollection 2025.
2
Barriers and facilitators of shared decision-making in prostate cancer screening in primary care: A systematic review.基层医疗中前列腺癌筛查共同决策的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Dec 12;37:102539. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102539. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shared Decision-Making Tools for Cancer Screening.
癌症筛查共同决策工具的混合方法系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;15(15):3867. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153867.
4
Lessons Learned to Promote Lung Cancer Screening and Preempt Worsening Lung Cancer Disparities.为促进肺癌筛查及避免肺癌差异加剧所吸取的经验教训。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 15;201(8):892-893. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201912-2398ED.
5
Systematic evaluation of written health information on PSA based screening in Germany.基于 PSA 筛查的前列腺癌防治健康信息的系统评价——德国实践
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0220745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220745. eCollection 2019.
6
Prostate cancer screening: Knowledge, attitudes and practices in a sample of men in Italy. A survey.前列腺癌筛查:意大利男性样本中的认知、态度与行为。一项调查。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0186332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186332. eCollection 2017.
7
Elderly Men's Experience of Information Material about Melanoma-A Qualitative Study.老年人对黑色素瘤信息材料的体验——一项定性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2013 Jul 11;1(1):5-19. doi: 10.3390/healthcare1010005.
8
A score to estimate the likelihood of detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy.一种用于评估结肠镜检查中发现晚期结直肠肿瘤可能性的评分。
Gut. 2014 Jul;63(7):1112-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304965. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
9
What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?当前癌症筛查决策辅助工具的不足之处是什么?
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 May;63(3):193-214. doi: 10.3322/caac.21180. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
10
[How can early detection programs become a men's health topic? Survey of urology practices].[早期检测项目如何成为男性健康话题?泌尿外科实践调查]
Urologe A. 2011 Dec;50(12):1600-5. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2705-5.