Suppr超能文献

比较两种快速检测梭状芽胞杆菌共同抗原的方法和一种检测艰难梭菌毒素 A/B 的方法与细胞培养中和试验的比较。

Comparison of two rapid assays for Clostridium difficile Common antigen and a C difficile toxin A/B assay with the cell culture neutralization assay.

机构信息

Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Jan;133(1):107-9. doi: 10.1309/AJCPO3QWOU8CYGEU.

Abstract

We compared 3 rapid assays for Clostridium difficile with a cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA). Of 600 stool samples, 46 were positive for toxigenic C difficile. Both rapid common antigen assays were highly sensitive (91.3%-100%) and, therefore, were appropriate screening tests. The rapid toxin assay had poor sensitivity (61%) but excellent specificity (99.3%). Testing stools for glutamate dehydrogenase (step 1) and those positive with a rapid toxin assay (step 2) would correctly classify 81% of submitted specimens within 2 hours, including during periods of limited staffing (evenings, nights, and weekends). CCNA could then be used as a third step to test rapid toxin-negative samples, thereby providing a final result for the remaining 19% of samples by 48 to 72 hours. The use of rapid assays as outlined could enhance timely diagnosis of C difficile.

摘要

我们将 3 种快速检测艰难梭菌的方法与细胞培养细胞毒性中和检测(CCNA)进行了比较。在 600 份粪便样本中,46 份为产毒艰难梭菌阳性。两种快速共同抗原检测方法均具有很高的敏感性(91.3%-100%),因此是合适的筛选检测方法。快速毒素检测法的敏感性(61%)较差,但特异性(99.3%)极好。对谷氨酸脱氢酶进行粪便检测(第 1 步),并对快速毒素检测阳性的粪便进行检测(第 2 步),可以在 2 小时内正确分类 81%的送检标本,包括在人员有限的时间段(晚上、夜间和周末)。然后,可以将 CCNA 用作第三步,检测快速毒素阴性的样本,从而在 48 至 72 小时内为其余 19%的样本提供最终结果。按照上述方法使用快速检测法可以提高艰难梭菌的及时诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验