激活型细胞穿透肽在体内的系统分布优于细胞穿透肽。

Systemic in vivo distribution of activatable cell penetrating peptides is superior to that of cell penetrating peptides.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0647, USA.

出版信息

Integr Biol (Camb). 2009 Jun;1(5-6):371-81. doi: 10.1039/b904878b. Epub 2009 May 11.

Abstract

Cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) have been developed as vehicles for payload delivery into cells in culture and in animals. However several biologic features limit their usefulness in living animals. Activatable cell penetrating peptides (ACPPs) are polycationic CPPs whose adsorption and cellular uptake are minimized by a covalently attached polyanionic inhibitory domain. Cleavage of the linker connecting the polyanionic and polycationic domains by specific proteases (tumor associated matrix metalloproteases discussed herein) dissociates the polyanion and enables the cleaved ACPP to enter cells. In contrast to their CPP counterpart, ACPPs are relatively nonadherent and distributed uniformly to normal tissues. While nonaarginine (r(9)) CPP administered intravenously into mice initially bind to the local vasculature and redistribute to the liver, where >90% of the injected dose accumulates 30 min after injection. Regardless of the presence of the polyanionic inhibitory domain, confocal imaging of live tissues reveals that the majority of the ACPP and CPP remain in punctate organelles, presumably endosomes. Therefore further improvements in the efficiency of delivery to the cytosol and nucleus are necessary. In addition to improved target specificity, a major advantage of ACPPs over CPPs for potential clinical applications is reduced toxicity. Systemically administered r(9) CPP causes acute toxicity in mice at a dose 4-fold lower than the MMP cleavable ACPP, a complication not observed with an uncleavable ACPP presumably because the polycationic charge remains masked systemically. These data suggest that ACPPs have greater potential than CPPs for systemic delivery of imaging and therapeutic agents.

摘要

细胞穿透肽 (CPP) 已被开发为将有效载荷递送至培养细胞和动物细胞中的载体。然而,一些生物学特性限制了它们在活体动物中的应用。可激活的细胞穿透肽 (ACPP) 是一种多阳离子 CPP,其通过共价连接的多阴离子抑制结构域吸附和细胞摄取最小化。通过特定蛋白酶(本文讨论的肿瘤相关基质金属蛋白酶)切割连接多阴离子和多阳离子结构域的连接物,使多阴离子解离并使切割的 ACPP 进入细胞。与 CPP 相比,ACPP 相对不附着并且均匀分布在正常组织中。虽然静脉内给予小鼠的非精氨酸 (r(9)) CPP 最初与局部血管结合并重新分布到肝脏,但在注射后 30 分钟内超过 90%的注射剂量累积。无论是否存在多阴离子抑制结构域,活组织的共焦成像显示,大多数 ACPP 和 CPP 仍留在点状细胞器中,推测是内体。因此,有必要进一步提高向细胞质和核的输送效率。除了提高靶向特异性外,ACPP 相对于 CPP 在潜在临床应用中的主要优势是毒性降低。全身性给予 r(9) CPP 在比 MMP 可切割 ACPP 低 4 倍的剂量下引起小鼠的急性毒性,这是未观察到不可切割 ACPP 的并发症,因为多阳离子电荷在系统中保持被掩盖。这些数据表明,ACPP 比 CPP 更有潜力用于全身递送成像和治疗剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索