• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

搜索顺序失去作用:忽略单一干扰项会影响视觉搜索效率。

A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.

作者信息

Kumada Takatsune

机构信息

Institute for Human Science and Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Central 6, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2009.12.002
PMID:20025896
Abstract

Four experiments investigated after-effects of attentional capture by a target-feature singleton distractor. In Experiments 1 and 3, participants searched for an orientation singleton target in a visual display and responded to a reported-attribute in the target (a compound search task). On some trials, a singleton distractor with the same orientation as, but a different color from, the target occurred. In the singleton distractor-absent trials reaction times for targets were unchanged irrespective of the number of nontargets. However, on singleton distractor-present trials, target reaction times increased with number of displayed nontargets. Ignoring target-feature singleton distractors induced inefficient visual searches slowed target search, suggesting that targets were searched serially in the presence of a singleton distractor induces inefficient serial search. This result implies that the search order, corresponding to relative item salience, is lost following attentional capture by a singleton distractor. Subsequent experiments explored conditions that might elicit the search order lost effect. It did not occur when task-irrelevant singleton distractors occurred in a compound search task (Experiment 2) or when target-feature (Experiment 4) singleton distractors occurred in a simple target detection task. Together, results suggest that the search order lost effect is mediated by dynamic computations involving saliency and feature maps. An explanation of this effect is proposed.

摘要

四项实验研究了目标特征单一干扰项对注意力捕捉的后效。在实验1和实验3中,参与者在视觉显示中搜索一个方向单一的目标,并对目标中的一个报告属性做出反应(复合搜索任务)。在一些试验中,会出现一个与目标方向相同但颜色不同的单一干扰项。在没有单一干扰项的试验中,无论非目标的数量如何,目标的反应时间都没有变化。然而,在有单一干扰项的试验中,目标反应时间随着显示的非目标数量的增加而增加。忽略目标特征单一干扰项会导致低效的视觉搜索,减缓目标搜索速度,这表明在存在单一干扰项的情况下,目标是串行搜索的,从而导致低效的串行搜索。这一结果意味着,在被单一干扰项吸引注意力后,与相对项目显著性相对应的搜索顺序就会丢失。后续实验探索了可能引发搜索顺序丢失效应的条件。当任务无关的单一干扰项出现在复合搜索任务中(实验2),或者当目标特征单一干扰项出现在简单目标检测任务中时(实验4),这种效应并未出现。综合来看,结果表明搜索顺序丢失效应是由涉及显著性和特征图的动态计算介导的。本文提出了对此效应的一种解释。

相似文献

1
A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.搜索顺序失去作用:忽略单一干扰项会影响视觉搜索效率。
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
2
Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.单例检测和特征搜索模式下的注意捕获。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):1003-20. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1003.
3
Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.试验间目标特征的变化不会因单独元素而导致更多干扰:目标不确定性才会。
Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
4
Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.当目标形状与非目标形状不可互换时,目标不确定性不会导致更大的单例干扰项干扰。
Vision Res. 2013 Mar 22;80:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
5
Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.当干扰项在快速序列视觉呈现期间保持可见时,注意力捕捉会减少。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):939-50. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.939.
6
The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.在单目标搜索和特征搜索中,视觉半视野的空间眨眼不对称。
Brain Cogn. 2011 Apr;75(3):261-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
7
Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.视觉搜索中不相关的单一样本不会吸引注意力,但可能会产生非空间过滤成本。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):645-60. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21390. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
8
Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.期望会调节显著颜色单一元素对注意力的吸引。
Vision Res. 2008 May;48(11):1315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
9
Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.视觉注意力捕获的电生理证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):604-13. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.4.604.
10
Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.听觉注意捕获:单一干扰声音的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Feb;30(1):180-93. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.180.